Both sides and the president s side, the Special Counsel side had a facetoface meeting last week. A rare facetoface meeting after weeks of informal discussions and were told by a source familiar myself, my colleague that Robert Muellers Team Provided more granularity on the topics they would like to discuss with the president in a possible interview under the umbrella of the firing of james comey as well as the firing of the former National Security adviser Michael Flynn. The specifics include the Attorney General Jeff Sessions role in the firing of james comey as well as what the president knew about his National Security adviser Michael Flynn and his conversation he had had with former Russian Ambassador Sergei Kizlyback about the actions. There is possible collusion, possible Obstruction Of Justice and what the president knew. Im told by a source familiar that legal team has taking the
topics and created questions possible questions that could be asked in an interview on a memo. But
bottom line is great. so speaking of making america great again, somehow it became synonymous with making america white again, starting in the cabinet. certainly on the numbers, that s a tough fact for the president to deal with. we re going to leave the debate there. i appreciate the arguments on both sides. scott jennings, angela rye, thank you. thanks, chris. leon panetta. that s a big name from politics. white house chief of staff. could he imagine an omarosa deal on his watch? two more big questions for him. does he think trump s attorney is changing his story about what the president told jim comey with regards to general flynn? and is a perjury trap a real risk to trump? former defense secretary, former director of the cia leon panetta, next. now t-mobile has unlimited for the rest of us. unlimited for you. for them. for all. get unlimited for as low at 30 bucks per line for four lines at t-mobile.
chris. i have a feeling that john kelly wanted to have this conversation. he wanted to do it in a place that was secure, and that s probably why they went to the situation room. but, again, it surprises me that the precautions weren t taken to make sure that it truly was secure. now, of course, their policy on devices is an honor code one, and for the speculation of it being wrong, i don t think it s illegal. i don t think what omarosa did is going to fall under the two applicable statutes about access or dissemination of defense information, right? no, i don t think so because the conversation really concerned a personnel matter related to something other than national security. the two different versions of what we re hearing from giuliani about what happened with the president and comey vis-a-vis
so what s fascinating to me is that corporate america where donald trump is allegedly this big rich billionaire boss that s figured it out, he s cracked the code, he still hasn t figured out that they ve all said that diversity and inclusion is the path forward to ensuring your bottom line is great. so speaking of making america great again, somehow it became synonymous with making america white again, starting in the cabinet. certainly on the numbers, that s a tough fact for the president to deal with. we re going to leave the debate there. i appreciate the arguments on both sides. scott jennings, angela rye, thank you. thanks, chris. leon panetta. that s a big name from politics. white house chief of staff. could he imagine an omarosa deal on his watch? two more big questions for him. does he think trump s attorney is changing his story about what the president told jim comey with regards to general flynn? and is a perjury trap a real risk to trump? former defense secretary, fo
the conversation really concerned a personnel matter related to something other than national security. the two different versions of what we re hearing from giuliani about what happened with the president and comey vis-a-vis flynn how material a difference well, we know it s a material difference. if he had a conversation with him where he said, go easy on him if you can, it matters a lot more than if he never had a conversation like that at all. but assuming, as rudy calls in the alternative, yes, they had that conversation, and he said, try to see your way clear of helping him. he s a good guy. what does that mean to you if you were told that by the president? i i don t think there s any question here that based on what the president said, based on what rudy giuliani has said about that conversation, that there was it was clear that