the daily caller recently found that even a washington post reporter admits to the dossiers contents as flat-out unverified. according to this reporter, not even the fbi or cia believe its key findings. watch this. the thing that people remember the most vividly about the dossier is the idea that there is a tape somewhere, of trump consorting with prostituen in moscow. there is other material in the dossier, we spent 18 months trying to find down. there is an assertion that michael cohen, trump s lawyer, dispels payments that were needed at the end of the campaign. we have had to reporters through every hotel in prague, all over the place, just to try to figurt out if he was ever there and came away.
and that is extremely important, because a lot of times when i was talking to sidney powellt about this, a lot of times, the raw materials, there was raw notes, are drastically different from the 302s. the judge will want to compare the raw notes of the fbi agents with the 302s.he remember, 302s should be done within five days. why were these 302s well, the three of them why were they don t consecutively, and so far apart? judge jeanine: and, i ll give you an example of how it supposed to be done. hillary clinton was interviewed onon july 2nd of 2016. her 302 was done that day. now we have three 302s that they try h to hide from the jude that they redacted heavily and we don t know which one is the accurate one and there is something that stinks. this judge knows identity has deep experience with prosecutors who lie, deceive, hide exculpatory evidence, and phony up false evidence.
attorney, and they were looking at him for possible criminal purposes, they were trying, and assigns, to a drop in because they already knew what the conversation was that he had with ambassador sergey kislyak and they were going to him. i think the judge is going to be looking at all this. remember one thing, judge jeanine, there is another fbi agent here. everybody has talked about peter strzok, every bond has seen what michael flynn has had to say but nobody has spoken to the other fbi agent. rod rosenstein has refused to make them available, notwithstanding congressional demands. what are they hiding? judge jeanine: they are hiding everything! they are delaying you know, i must say, sara, when you talk about the beginning of the 302, it says come after being advised of the eight of the identities of the interviewing agents and the nature of the interview, flynn provided the following information. so you are saying, they said to
work for him, who were the ones who were clearly the ones who tried to turn an election. listen, what happened today with his disgraceful trashing of fox news was really an embarrassing episode for jim comey. he disgraced himself. sadly, he is taking the rest of the fbi with him and that is a shame. there are a lot of good folks working over there. i talked to a lot of them who are embarrassed by jim comey. to answer your question, no, i don t think comey will get away with it. here s the reason why. let s not forget, there is a very specific, verified procedure to verify information before it goes before the fisa courts. we know that dossier was not verified. jim comey, at some point, had to have signed off on that verification procedure for ati document we now know was a hoax. there is a paper trail, judge. judge jeanine: dan, i wish i were as confident as you. i c don t hear any fisa court judge complaining. i don t hear any judge saying, i
of a fisa court warrant. we continue to operate, or at least the left us, on the assumption that the dossier is the backbone of this investigation, and yet you have major reporters from major organizations like the washington post doing deep dives now for nearly two years and they cannot verify this. they cannot find any substantial facts to substantiate what was presented to the fisa courts. the reporter from the washington post, we found bob woodward writing books, other reporters doing deep investigative work into this and nobody r can substantiated. set aside the reporters for a moment, what about what this reporter admitted? the fbi and cia, two of the top intelligence and law enforcement agencies, cannot substantiate what s in the dossier. still, people are operating under the assumption, including the special counsel, that there is something there to be