So, you know, as claire was saying, there are so many more substantive allegations now including this misuse and abuse of a highly classified Intelligence Community Computer Network system. And for people to say that this didnt fall under the dnis purview is wrong. The dni is responsible for maintaining the integrity of those systems. And if it is being used to cover up political corruption, that requires an investigation. And whether or not the senior official was asked to hide that material inside that Computer System. So i do think that donald trump and his associates are in a heck of a lot more political trouble right now than they were 48 hours ago because of the substantive flow of these allegations coming through,
again all reinforcing the theme that this is a corrupt white house that will stoop to doing anything in order to prevail in elections as well as to cover their krucht trackcorrupt track. Weigh in on the idea that President Trump took all of the conduct detailed in the
В России активно растет интерес к яхтингу как возможности для летнего отдыха piterburger.ru - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from piterburger.ru Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
donald trump s personal attorney? rudy giuliani has never represented the interests of the united states. he has always represented his clients interests. and there is no question about that in terms of my view. i think what congress needs to do is to go to fact witnesses. that would of course include giuliani, but it would also include all the people who overheard this conversation, who know about the storage of the data and why it is in this strange code named protected area instead of just in the normal place that it should be. that is what we need to do in the same way that the mueller investigation shouldn t have started with mueller. this shouldn t start with the dni. you need the fact witnesses, the sub be stastantive witnesses wh tell what happened. that is where you get the credibility and where you get a persuasive case that is com spelling to people. that is where i d like to be. but i would say that the