and you are talking about the motion to proceed. closing debate essentially. each loses power when we move away from the 60 vote standard. that would cause me great concern. there is nobody actively com paining for that and if they are, they are not catching momentum. what is your concern here in the debate about susan rice. is it what she did or what could be? what do you think should matter more? i want to focus on the sectio702 of the surveillance act. this is something i have been warning about for six years now. i have been concerned about the
mr. miller over mrs. murcowski, but paul and candidates who would be human interest stories who this year are beating establishment republicans in primaries all over the country. christine o donnell and her history of com paining against things that don t get discussed on cable news now must be discussed on cable news. in her former job describing herself as the president and founder of the saviors alliance for lifting the truth, christine o donnell told an mtv interviewer that conservators were not going far enough. it is not enough to be ab sti nent with other people, you have to be ab sti nent alone. the bible said lust in your heart is committing adultery. you can t a word that rhymes