it s not really defined, that seems like a pretty broad phase to phrase to me. and then those complaints would get vetted and go to the a panel of circuit court judges for review. it seems to me almost like an open-ended rolling impeachment process at paul: it d be open political season on the court anytime they issued an opinion that people didn t like. and similar to the recusal system. so the white house bill has a forced, congressionally-enforced recusal rules. republican witnesses were saying that basically what you d end up in any real big case was pre-litigation over which of the justices are allowed to hear the case. and i don t think that s really a way to, you know, prove the integrity of the court. paul: dan, the language that sheldon whitehouse used, the supreme court has proven it can t police itself. police? why should we be policing the supreme court? isn t he talking about imposing a large tree of political degree of political control over