says yeah, they were listening in. they were looking in. they were checking in to see what kind of collusion he might have had are with the russian government. there probably wasn t any collusion at all. the question isn t even if. now go back and attack their own reporting to try to say this is different. this is different. is preposterous. steve: chris, what do you make of that. if they have evidence printed in their own newspapers yeah they were wiretaps. no collusion. why is their hair on fire today? well, have you seen it living in new york. i see it living in d.c. this weird trump derangement syndrome. steve: pds. it seemed like it mighting a passing thing. people may calm down. it s nuts they haven t. i start to wonder. i see people may be respectable a year ago getting more and more and more out of control. new york times columnists calling for trump s tax returns to be illegally leaked. people in the outgoing white