Climbing 8. 86 how do we interpret the market is the market heartless in response to the plea of the protesters is the Market Making judgments about the difference between violent protest and passive resistance i know many people wish it would. They want the market to be part of the debate. They want it to play a constructive role in the dialogue over racial ee qualiqur go down to express empathy for the troubled times were living through. Thats not how it works. The truth is the markets blind because it has no eyes its deaf because it has no ears its a convenient abstraction, not a personal opinion investors make judgments until recently nobody was investing with an eye toward making the world a better place whatever that might be now there is a Younger Generation of investors with hearts in their heads. I share the sentiment. For the most part people pick stocks because theyre trying to make money we buy stocks at companies, Good Companies with good longterm prospects. Mainly ones th
Such an idea, in general, in the Industry Development strategy until the thirtieth year, is envisaged as a kind of guaranteeing Management Organization from the outside and local governments, when the company is not able to take over house at some point, so that this Apartment Building does not remain without management, the very same and guaranteeing Management Company appears. But i also like one legislative initiative that is currently being considered in the state duma, and it is assumed that the qualification requirements for managers of the Management Company will also increase, and there is a procedure for independent assessment of qualifications, when the director of the Management Company, the chief engineer and many other specialists in this company must be handed over the qualification exam, in my opinion, is also a measure that will allow us to restore order, thank you, about debts on utility bills, we spoke with the chairman of the council for professional qualifications i
Mr. Zarda passed away in 2014 and his estate continued the suit. Heres the oral argument from september of 2017. Good afternoon. Each side has been assigned 30 minutes, divided ten minutes per person. And that time may be exceeded depending on how things go during the argument. We will hear from mr. Antollino. Good afternoon, your honor and all your honors. My cocounsel who works with me. We are proud to represent Melissa Zarda and bill moore, executors of the zarda estate and asked the court to construe and unite title vii with life as we live it and under the plain language and its interpretations. We ask that you find that Sexual Orientation discrimination a sex discrimination under title vii. Donald zarda was a male. He was known as gay though he was not traditionally feminist when he was a great skydiver. When a customer complained that he identified himself as gay, he was fired. And for the revelation it was a violation of the statute because his sex, a male, who was attracted to
Zarda passed away in 2014. His estate is continuing with his suit. This is one hour 45 minutes. Good afternoon. Each side has been assigned 30 minutes, 10 minutes per person. Exceeded may be depending on how things go during the argument. From mr. Antolino. Good afternoon. Case, we are proud to present the executives of the. Arda estate we ask that you find that Sexual Orientation discrimination is sex discrimination under title vii. Was a male. Complained that he identified as gay, he was fired. Revelation it was a violation of the statute because a male who was attracted to other men was a motivating factor in the adverse action. Case, he identified as gay only because he was accused of being straight. He was proud of being gay. And in the workplace of the skydiving community, jokes were that loosened the tension of the experience, and the jokes were often sexual. Allegation that he was gay, or exposed because he was gay . He was known to be gay, but because he came out as gay to a c
Dont those cases trying to question whether there can be the best construction of the language where those cases are wrongly decided because they are not covered . This may need should probably revisit it is actually pretty glaring but it doesnt mention Price Waterhouse even though it was decided 6 years after Price Waterhouse but if you are asking do we have to . I agree there is a differential between what the Supreme Court said and what Circuit Courts have said as far as tolerating genderbased differentials but if you dont want to do any more work it would be sufficient to rest it on the differential there that did not involve a constitutional right and differential here absolutely does. Discriminating against people exercising their constitutional rights, a private employer as we read in the newspaper the last couple days can fire someone for expressing his political opinions. Absolutely, we certainly have. It is not just gay men and lesbians who have fundamental right to marry but