obsession is going to come back and later in the day he may still tweet about it and he s obsessing about this being fake, something that the democrats or the press have trumped up. and it s why he can t move on to actually helping the countsry deal with this threat of russia, rather than just talking about how the threat doesn t really exist. i mean over the years you ve been a source of the president s anger. you were sued by him. is it something he can expend? get it out of his head and move on from? no, because i think he s very afraid of the russia investigation. the core issue is that this has morphed from simply being an obstruction of justice investigation or a collusion investigation. i have serious doubt he cares about the collusion piece of it, into a financial investigation. and i think he s been concerned about that from the beginning and i think tlarls why he s been so aggressive in trying to derail it and has put it so
no, because i think he s very afraid of the russia investigation. the core issue here, which has morphed from simply being a obstruction of justice investigation or a collusion investigation, i have serious doubts he cares about the collusion piece of it, into a financial investigation. i think he s been concerned about that from the beginning. i think that s why he s been so aggressive in trying to derail it, and put it so front of mind all the time in his administration, because it s going to come back to the money trail. and that is going to lead to his wallet, his business operation. and the thing about someone who over the course of his business career doesn t have a closet of skeletons, he has a warehouse full of them. your feed is breaking up. brett, you knew the president as a businessman. you reported on im. would certain issues how do
he said that under oath, said it very directly. either there was no collusion that he saw, and by the way, that doesn t mean there wasn t collusion, that s why we have an investigation, or he wasn t telling the truth. we just have to get to the bottom of the collusion piece. let me ask you the bigger picture, it really is how russia influenced the election, and if there is collection. there very well could not be collusion. but don t you think it s important that if he failed to disclose some of these meetings and he was only one or the only one who members who were like him who met with the russian ambassador and disclosed it or disclosed it at some point, you don t think that s important? there is political importance to that and there may even be legal implications, if he says one thing and actually did something different, that would certainly are legal implications. but from a purely intelligence perspective, i ve heard
collusion and on that, sessions was direct. he said absolutely i was not involved in collusion and i didn t see any collusion. he said that under oath, said it very directly. either there was no collusion that he saw, and by the way. that doesn t mean there wasn t collusion, that s why we have an investigation, or he wasn t telling the truth. we just have to get to the bottom of the collusion piece. let me ask you the bigger picture really is how russia influenced the election, and if there is collection. there very well could not be collusion. but don t you think it s important that if he failed to disclose some of these meetings and he was only one or the only one who members who were like him who met with the russian ambassador and didn t disclose it or disclosed it at some point? you don t think that s important? there is political importance to that and there may even be legal implications, if he says one thing under oath and actually did something
cats. and in greg. [laughter] [laughter] juan: and epileptic seizures.pi there is ann alternative view. the alternative view is, if, in fact, you compromise the integrity ofin our elections, as dany was touching on, that is not good. greg: no, i agree. last year, when we first were stumbling onto the story, i was the loudest screamer about russian interference. juan: so they are not cat paws. j the seriousness greg: the collusion piece is the catspaw. there is nothing there. kimberly: they want catnip. they want to president trump. juan: there is nothing we know about in the ongoing investigation. greg: you can say that until the day we die. kimberly: may be they all figured it out and something miraculously pops up after comey had been fired and between the time when mueller has taken over. i don t think so. jesse: the white house reaction to the sessions hearing straight ahead. and we are awaiting the arrival