Anderson Cooper takes viewers beyond the headlines with indepth reporting and investigations. He said that initially. They later reversed themselves and flynn was indicted for making a false statement to an fbi agent. But as point of fact, judge, hes told them things that were not true and things that he should have known and recollected in realtime. Right. Maybe he did. And maybe he did it because he thought there was some impropriety about having the conversation with kislyak. Thats why sally yates, then at the a. G. s office, then went to don mcgahn and said you better figure out Whats Going On with this. I dont think there was any impropriety in that conversation at all. In fact i think flynn would have been committing malpractice if he had not had the conversation with kislyak. He is the guy who was going to be the National Security then why did he lie about it . Beats me. Thats a good question, no . Its an excellent question, but i dont know the extent to which he lied, whether h
lindsey graham today. i don t know where this goes, but i know impeachment will be over soon. i supported the mueller investigation, by the way, for those who care about domestic politics. i didn t know what trump had done. there is no collusion between the trump campaign and the russians. if you re not colluding with your own government, why do you think you re colluding with the russians? the president is not much of a colluder. so the bottom line here is that mueller spent two years and $25 million looking at all things trump and russia, and now we re impeaching the president of the united states. by partisan people, no outside counsel involved. this thing will come to the senate. and it will die quickly, and i will do everything i can to make it die quickly. i just wonder how quickly. let s do a bit on procedure. there s a debate about how a trial should be held in the
gop senator lindsey graham is taking his defense for president trump to new levels this morning. in a lengthy interview with our becky anderson, graham says that he s already made up his mind on impeachment and he says that he plans to vote to acquit the president in the senate even though the trial hasn t even started yet. watch. i don t know where this goes, but i know impeachment will be over soon. i supported the mueller investigation, by the way, for those who care about domestic politics. i didn t know what trump had done with the russians. what have i come to believe? there is no collusion between the trump campaign and the russians. if you re not colluding with your own government, why do you think you re colluding with the russians? the president is not much of a colluder. so the bottom line here is that mueller spent two years and $25 million looking at all things trump and russia and now we re impeaching the president of the
your own government, why do you think you re colluding with the russians. the president is not much of a colluder. so, the bottom line here is that mueller spent two years and $25 million looking at all things in russia and now we re impeaching the president of the united states. bipartisan people, no outside counsel involved, this thing will come to the senate and it will die quickly and i will do everything i can to make it die quickly. just wonder how quickly. let s do a little bit on procedure. there s a debate ongoing about how a trial should be held in the senate, including whether to have live witnesses. you don t support live witnesses, why? i want this to end as quick as possible for the good of the senate, for the good of the country. and i think the best thing for america to do is get this behind us. we know how it s going to end, so we can focus on the problems
any specific activities who knows how much donald trump was made aware? but i don t believe donald trump is an innocent operating in the dark victim here. i think he s a colluder with giuliani and i think he aided, abetted and empowered him. the president today was talking about the kent testimony, that it was good for him, right? that maybe this would be the first non-fake news, obviously it was before he heard this report. perhaps what he did here, though, is what we understand is that kent said he raised concerns in early 2015 when biden was vice president, that that kent had raised concerns about his son being on the ukrainian board and not directly to the vice president, but to a staffer who turned kent away and said, look, his other son is battling cancer. he doesn t have the bandwidth to deal with this. it doesn t sound like from kent s testimony that it ever got to the vice president, but there was a concern about this. does that concern you that there were people involved