That Monetary Policy, whether she should brief congress more often, and whether she is showing partisanship by meeting with treasury secretary jack lew. Chair yellen also discussed income inequality. Chair yellen what we can do is ensure a generally strong labor market where it is possible for those who want to work to find jobs in a reasonable amount of time. We cant determine the wages associated with those jobs or what sectors those jobs will appear in, of the policies that we follow and the general state of the economy have an important influence on the overall strength of the job market. Mark a promising report for the u. S. Housing industry. Sold last month new homes sold us month and a faster pace than expected. Weather may have skewed the results. Sales new home sales in the northeast phil to an alltime low. In the south, they climb to the highest level in more than six years. Three men have been arrested on terrorism charges for allegedly running to travel to syria to join the
The goal or the purpose of the books to not only talk about how to revive the constitution and restore the republic, but to inform people on what the republic is supposed to look like, how the constitution is supposed to function and to move some of the Decision Making away from the centralized Government Back to the state legislatures acting collectively as the framers intended. Host you write in the liberty amendments about the 17th amendment. The 17th amendment serves not the public interest, but the interests of the governing masterminds and their disciples. Its early proponents advance, it is not because they championed democracy or the individual, but because they knew it would be one of several important mechanisms for empowering the federal government and unraveling Constitutional Republicanism. Guest right. The framers didnt create a pure democracy. That would be absolute nonsense and crazy. In fact, if you look at the constitution, its very complex, what they created here. Yo
The federal government is so completely out of control with the constitution that when you look at the various phases of what it is doing, it would be nice if we could break them into three separate branches. But it is more much now than ever before. And they dont check at much as they used to and of course sometimes it is never even contemplated, this massive Administrative State. And so its all quite important. And the goal is to not only talk about how to revive the constitution but to inform people with above public is supposed to look like and how the constitution is supposed to function and to move some of the decisionmaking and the centralized situation and you write about the 17th amendment. Because it serves not the Public Interest but the governing mastermind of the disciples. Not because they championed democracy or the individual but because they knew it would be one of several important mechanisms for unraveling the constitution. That would be absolute nonsense and crazy.
There are 310 Million People in this country, he cant accept the possibility, he cant accept it, and im a kook who cant speak for six seconds on his show because i cant get through the screener, okay . Guest cant imagine why. Caller well, you cant get through the screener host all right, you know what . Guest we have a new line here at cspan. Its called the kook line. Now, let me try and remember some of this, because i cant remember all of it. Number one, the Koch Brothers dont Fund Anything that i do. Number two, no groups buy my. Host buses, leaflets. Guest i have no idea about buses or leaflets, but so what if they do . Gee whiz, the democrats never use big money to Fund Anything. Lets see, what was the other thing he said, do you remember it all . Yeah, i know, it was so memorable. But i cant think of everything that he said. But host he couldnt get through on your screeners. Ing . Thats a good screen or. [laughter] sometimes they sneak through, sometimes they dont. But everything
Probable cause and opposition to warrantless searches. You condemn the fifth amendment, condemn the First Amendment and free speech and religious liberty . Condemn all these amendments, which were also adopted by many of the framers who were slave owners. Do you reject them, too . The rational position should be, what did these men create that is beneficial to this nation . What they created that is beneficial to this nation is a society, if they couldnt be completely free of slavery then, is free of slavery today, and thats what the constitution sets thats what the declaration of independence sets forth. In other words, its set in motion. And the constitution, a governing document, set in place. So, i reject this idea that these men are to be dismissed, and one of the reasons george mason didnt sign the constitution was because he didnt think it went far enough on the matter of slavery. Matter of fact the issue of slavery came up early during the Constitutional Convention in georgia a