full-on re-election mode this year. i think it s fair to wonder, susan, why many people in the crowd aren t asking when they chant back where is the wall? you ve been promising this for four years, where s the wall we ve been chanting about. it s interesting because i remember when you would interview people at those rallies, they didn t think he would really build the wall, they just liked the concept behind it. and, julia, talking about a concept behind it, you know, one of the things that s recently come up, there s still scores of lawsuits from the george bush administration that are for eminent domain purposes. so it seems that the administration, the officials in the administration, are trying to tackle these problems, but the president is completely unaware of them or just wants them to do some kind of magic trick. can you get into a little bit of the issues that these officials are facing? you re absolutely right. i spoke to a lawyer who s representing a client in the rio
breaking ground and they want to build what are actually new miles of wall. and this lawyer s representing a client who has a case from 2008 at the end of the bush administration. that s over ten years ago now. and so these cases can get very drawn out, very tenuous in court, especially if this is a large landowner or rancher in texas that has the means to pay the legal fees and says, no, i m not giving up this land so easily. other people aren t as lucky. they don t have the means to pay lawyers and hold on to that. but there are a number of pro bono lawyers. i ve spoken to people from the texas civil rights project, people who are going in to represent these people who have had this land in their family for years who honestly didn t expect their land to be on the track of the border wall but have now been told that they re going to have this erected. what i think a lot of this will hinge on is whether or not courts will go with the administration strategy when they argue that say tha