most importantly, at the direction of the president. would that be uninvited coconspirators. i don t know any question that the testimony provided under oath wasn t directed mr. cohen to commit the crimes. would make it unindicted co-conspirator. doesn t that say to you in terms of threshold for impeachment, has that not crossed that line. i think there s a lot of information that s in the public domain that races very serious questions about the president s conduct. we have an investigation underway by the presidential counsel. responsibility to protect the investigation and let mr. mueller finish his work. report it to congress. we ll take appropriate action.
then sk squelched. is there reason to believe that he as the cfo of the trump organization will be queried about that? is it just about these payments? that s why this is particularly interesting because if it is about cohen and if it is about the payments, that doesn t make a lot of sense because cohen s already been got. cohen s already pleaded guilty. he s no longer really of interest in terms of securing a conviction for the government. so why move on to weisselberg? it can only mean to give that grant of immunity that the information he has is so valuable it logically extends beyond payments that cohen has already testified to. now of course the government needs corroboration, they do need someone if addition to cohen saying these payments were made. they have a tape, maybe that helps them but it doesn t make sense that they would give weisselberg immunity for just securing more of a conviction against michael cohen who s already been convicted. the implication is that this immu
putin said, hey, we re not going to play in this election. it is too confusing to know who helps us and who doesn t. we will take a time here and then we will become complacent. we ll say, oh, there was no big russian thing and of course there was. and then the big fight in 2020, we won t be ready for again. yeah. that s the warning we need to take very seriously. thanks for having me. we ll be right back. dates! you look amazing. and you look amazingly comfortable. when your v-neck looks more like a u-neck. that s when you know, it s half-washed. add downy to keep your collars from stretching. unlike detergent alone, downy conditions to smooth and strengthen fibers. so, next time don t half-wash it. downy and it s done. you wouldn t accept from any one else. why accept it from an allergy pill?
other words, if courts were to agree with that analysis, that would preclude state attorneys general as well as federal prosecutors from return an indictment. so in other words the state attorney general is not bound by the rule not to indict the president, but it would obviously appear before a court and that court may say it doesn t matter who did it, it s not constitutional. yeah, that s exactly right and also i think one other thing worth pointing out, the way prosecutors work is they re not looking for trap doors in policies. they are trying to figure out what the law is, what the facts and the evidence are and what the law allows. so, if a state attorney general looking at this on the merits concludes in their office that the olc got it right, that it would be unconstitutional to indict a sitting president, they re not going to go forward just because they re not bound by the olc opinion. on the other hand, if they in good faith looked at the issues and concluded that they th
what russian officials say in the nonclassified domain now. i used to do it in both domains and i don t think it is obvious what they re seeking to achieve in 2018. it might just be to keep sowing division in society and amplifying those divisions that are already there and just that s it. and one very, you know, plausible hypothesis, theory we have to keep in mind is that putin and the kremlin said, hey, we re not going to play in this election. it is too confusing, it s too hard to know who helps us and who doesn t. we will take a time out here and then we will become complacent. we ll say, oh, we solved this problem and we haven t. we ll say, oh, there was no big russian thing and, of course, there was. and then the big fight in 2020, we won t be ready for again. yeah. that s the warning we need to take very seriously. michael mcfaul, good to see you as always. ambassador, thank you. thanks for having me. we ll be right back. fact is, every insurance company hopes you drive sa