scale. it s quite earth worldly. every time this gets to something i really would like to talk about with you, every time we talk about the romney and ryan budgets in the press, every time you see a graph showing what they do to the budget, what is basically embedded in that? what is being assumed every time you hear about the deficit reduction? they take the tax plans which above and beyond the bush tax cuts are trillions of dollars, i believe, paul ryan s is in the $4 trillion. they re both above $4 trillion. they tell you they won t cost money. they tell the congressional budget office they won t cost any money. and they don t say how. they say we ll cut other parts of the tax code, deductions and loopholes and exclusions and the like to pay for it. to pay for paul ryan s tax plan, you would need to cut almost every tax break in the code out. employer health care deduction, and this is from a party that has refused to pay for taxes. so i don t see how you can buy that. i don t
every time this gets to something i really would like to talk about with you, every time we talk about the romney and ryan budgets in the press, every time you see a graph showing what they do to the budget, what is basically embedded in that? what is being assumed every time you hear about the deficit reduction? they take the tax plans which above and beyond the bush tax cuts are trillions of dollars, i believe, paul ryan s is in the $4 trillion. they re both above $4 trillion. they tell you they won t cost money. they tell the congressional budget office they won t cost any money. and they don t say how. they say we ll cut other parts of the tax code, deductions and loopholes and exclusions and the like to pay for it. to pay for paul ryan s tax plan, you would need to cut almost every tax break in the code out. employer health care deduction, and this is from a party that has refused to pay for taxes. so i don t see how you can buy that. i don t see how you can say
talk about with you, every time we talk about the romney and ryan budgets in the press, every time you see a graph showing what they do to the budget, what is basically embedded in that? what is being assumed every time you hear about the deficit reduction? they take the tax plans which above and beyond the bush tax cuts are trillions of dollars, i believe, paul ryan s is in the $4 trillion. they re both above $4 trillion. they tell you they won t cost money. they tell the congressional budget office they won t cost any money. and they don t say how. they say we ll cut other parts of the tax code, deductions and loopholes and exclusions and the like to pay for it. to pay for paul ryan s tax plan, you would need to cut almost every tax break in the code out. employer health care deduction, and this is from a party that has refused to pay for taxes. so i don t see how you can buy that. i don t see how you can say until they name the cuts, which they haven t, that these tax plans are
kibosh on putting this code out, the chances are we won t see contagion tomorrow. we need to keep an eye on this. i don t want everyone out there think this is something you ll be hearing about with your breakfast tomorrow. no way. so it makes sense with the national science advisory board is asking these two journalists to do and since they re letting them publish excerpts, it s not really censorship. the community has always been against this, alisyn, and i think they re coming around. under president bush, this first came out. we got bioterrorists out there. let s restrict the amount of information they can have. i m all for that and now these two journals look like they ll go along with it, too. don t tell ron paul. probably not going to like it. this is one incident where i believe in big government. right, 13 minutes before the top of the hour. that s dr. marc siegel. on sunday at 10:30 with dr. sumadi. coming up, should our leaders offer condolences to the family