have told you in past, h d two major defeats with public corrupt sh corruption cases. over at department of justice. he flew tblew the cases, supreme court identify turns bob mcdonald corruption decision, from politico in 2016, i it it says: so he takes a bribe s bribery statutes and expand its that supreme court says you cannot do, that. they set fo forth a straight forward rule, setting up a meeting, du does not qualify as an official act in return for a favor like a trip. so they destroyed mcdonald s career. bankrupted the man. ruined his marriage. then oops, 8 to 0 supreme court says this outrage out, who is behind it? jack the ripper smith, another one abc news, 2012. saying: a case in which john edwards or his people asked donors to contribute money to put up his pregnant girlfriend at a apartment. to try to cover it up during the course of his election. and what did jock t jack the ri ripper conclude, that is a crime under federal election code, how? it contributed
have told you in past, he had two major defeats with public corrupt sh corruption cases. over at department of justice. he flew tblew the cases, supreme court identify turns bob mcdonald corruption decision, from politico in 2016, i it it says: so he takes a bribe s bribery statutes and expand its that supreme court says you cannot do, that. they set fo forth a straight forward rule, setting up a meeting, du does not qualify as an official act in return for a favor like a trip. so they destroyed mcdonald s career. bankrupted the man. ruined his marriage. then oops, 8 to 0 supreme court says this outrage out, who is behind it? jack the ripper smith, another one abc news, 2012. saying: a case in which john edwards or his people asked donors to contribute money to put up his pregnant girlfriend at a apartment. to try to cover it up during the course of his election. and what did jock t jack the ri ripper conclude, that is a crime under federal election code, how? it contribu
wow. the government s position. department of justice, prosecutor s position, is that was the correct decision. because they fought judicial watch. when it came to the acquisition of this information there never should have been a grand jury on the documents case, ever, never. it should never had occurred. in should never have been a search warrant, or a fbi s.w.a.t. team raid on president trump house, cobb vehicoc vehic. obstruction. if the government really felt it had to do something about this, they followed civil track, they go to a jthey get an order, a vif siv civil order. he ordered president trump and his people to turn over the documents, let s play
wow. the government s position. department of justice, prosecutor s position, is that was the correct decision. because they fought judicial watch. when it came to the acquisition of this information there never should have been a grand jury on the documents case, ever, never. it should never had occurred. in should never have been a search warrant, or a fbi s.w.a.t. team raid on president trump house, cobb vehicoc vehic. obstruction. if the government really felt it had to do something about this, they followed civil track, they go to a jthey get an order, a vif siv civil order. he ordered president trump and his people to turn over the documents, let s play