he doesn t say it in the minds of my own people. and he is beginning to be not believable to me. believable or not, the president admits his oil and gas, nuclear and coal talk is a way to win over senate republicans as he tries to salvage his floundering senate legislation. there should be a bipartisan agreement that we have to take a both end approach rather than either or approach. so, how is that working out? we don t need to attach expanding america s energy supply to this cap and trade scheme that the president keeps pushing back to. cap and trade, of course, refers to the white house push for carbon based emission controls and taxes on companies that violate those strict caps. now, last year s president s budget assumed $646 billion in taxes from these emission-based increases. this year s budget assumes no taxes from it, many interpret that bret, as a sign of surrender, at least on the tax component of cap and trade.
he doesn t say it in the minds of my own people. and he is beginning to be not believable to me. believable or not, the president admits his oil and gas, nuclear and coal talk is a way to win over senate republicans as he tries to salvage his floundering senate legislation. there should be a bipartisan agreement that we have to take a both end approach rather than either or approach. so, how is that working out? we don t need to attach expanding america s energy supply to this cap and trade scheme that the president keeps pushing back to. cap and trade, of course, refers to the white house push for carbon based emission controls and taxes on companies that violate those strict caps. now, last year s president s budget assumed $646 billion in taxes from these emission-based increases. this year s budget assumes no taxes from it, many interpret that bret, as a sign of surrender, at least on the tax component of cap and trade.