he hasn t said if he ll support that route. what is your message to him? he has said he does support the current two-track process. i think we need to have some time to let this play out and compare the two proposals. if there s not climate change put into the bipartisan bill or if there s not funding for co-priorities, i m not sure the house would be able to support that. let s see what two proposals ultimately look like at the end of the day. to be clear, he says he needs to see what s in the bill. he s supportive of the two-track process on reconciliation he s not committed to that. i want to ask you about your colleague, congresswoman cortez who said she won t commit to the plan if manchin won t commit to the reconciliation package. would you do the same? i think right now it s important to just let the two parallel tracks play out and to
eric, if you want to subsidize wine [ laughter ]ze you should drink it, which i do. if you re i against cronyism, yu have to be against all subsidies for booze, for green energy, for film production. and actually for women, children and infant, too. i disagree with you, eric that, this is a question of priority. i think coburn has beenprio inconsistent here. he should be against all subsidies. people want to help any industry or any individual, they should help them.ub government is not a charity. that would be the extreme. colonel west, what about it? the democrats blame sequester and talked about cutting this, cutting that. they ended up cutting assistance. meanwhile we re spending money on wineries. that s the whole point. you could try to raise the level of pain and i think that s whate you see happening here. but it is about priorities. in the military, we understood our task and our purpose and o priorities, and it just calls into question what really is the