Mr. Buck votes aye. Mr. Ratcliffe . Yes. Ms. Roby votes aye. Mr. Gaetz votes aye. Mr. Johnson of louisiana votes aye. Mr. Biggs votes aye. Mr. Mcclintock votes aye. Ms. Lesko votes aye. Mr. Reschenthaler votes aye. Mr. Cline votes aye. Ms. Armstrong votes yes. Any members wish to vote who havent voted . The clerkve will report. Mr. Richmond, you are not recorded. No. Mr. Richmond votes no. Ared there any other member who havent voted who wish to vote . The clerk will report. Mr. Chairman there are 17 ayes and 23 nos. The agreement is not agreed to. Any substitute . Mr. Gates . I have an amendment at the desk. The gentleman has an amendment at thetl desk. The clerk will report the amendment. The gentlelady reserves point of order. Amendment to Thein Amendmentn the nature of a substitute offered by mr. Gates of florida page three strike lines 10 through 11 and insert the following. A, aer wellknown Corrupt Compa Burisma and corrupt hiring of hunter biden. The gentleman is recognized to e
president and as a candidate when he repeatedly denied everee speaking to hunter, his brother or his words, anybody for that matter, about their foreign business dealings. we know that was a lie. we lie that joe biden leveragedv 1 billion taxpayer dollars and loan guarantees for ukraine and insisted that a prosecutor e be fired in 6 hours as a result of that. his son. hunter was sitting on a board that he admitted on good morning america that he hada experience to be on, continued to get paid. ultimately, it was millions of o dollars in the end. and my question wan is, tell meu how that s not influence peddling. peu know, bribery statute, mr. speaker, does not demand that somebody benefit themselves financially. in this case, the vice president, as the 1023 forum pointed out, took a specifict action and his family, you know, was involved in personad l enrichment, that being hunter. , based on his actions is that bribery to you?
legislation, or even the enforcement of the lies that are on the books and again, the american people want leadership, they want t see us fighting, they want t see that we care about human life the republicans have yet t show that. and i ve been showing it for many years first of all, just to underline the political theory here, you had speaker mccarthy not seeming to have an issue with all of the crimes i manhattan, he spoke to the new york stock exchange. i want you to listen to what h said in the coming weeks, th house will vote on it filled t lift the debt ceiling into nex year save taxpayers trillions o dollars, make us less dependen on china, curve our high inflation, all without touchin social security and medicare they re trying to assur wall street that they are no going to feel the pain o republican brinkmanship. but their plan includes snap
from social media. it changes the way you think about your identity, and the place of your identity in th world. it changes the way you think about other social groups. and makes you more distrustful and antagonistic towards them, and it even changes your sense of right and wrong, the way yo judge what is moral and immora is distorted by the platforms. that s not something they se out to do, but it is something that they have evidence that they are going to be doing and it is now we can actually show how tha effect works it might not be what they set out to do, but it s what they re doing, and they re not stopping so what s going to change this right? if we re addicted, we re not changing our behavior. the government hasn t regulate anything, and these companie are making zillion s o dollars. so what will be the catalyst t change things? i think there s a top dow and a bottom up answer and for both of these, i think a lot of it has to do with jus a mental shift and understanding
when you re off line, far away from social media. it changes the way you think about your identity, and the place of your identity in th world. it changes the way you think about other social groups. and makes you more distrustful and antagonistic towards them, and it even changes your sense of right and wrong, the way yo judge what is moral and immora is distorted by the platforms. that s not something they se out to do, but it is something that they have evidence that they are going to be doing and it is now we can actually show how tha effect works it might not be what they set out to do, but it s what they re doing, and they re not stopping so what s going to change this right? if we re addicted, we re not changing our behavior. the government hasn t regulate anything, and these companie are making zillion s o dollars. so what will be the catalyst t change things? i think there s a top dow and a bottom up answer and for both of these, i think a lot of it has to do with jus