you can put in other bad act as evidence to prove intent. what you just referenced, which we just saw that clip, h clearly has a theory of the la here, which is that it s all his. i mean, and he s not been sh about that - he said it to hannity, o course i ll do it, it s al mine this is essentially all made up he and others have said, i can declassify things with the power of my mind i could telepathically tur them over. there is evidence here als amassed by the reporting of th washington post that he sought advice from other lawyers an advisers on how he could kee documents, after being told by some in his team he could not, people familiar with the investigation said they have collected evidence that multiple advisers warne trump that trying to keep th documents could be legally - there is evidence here als amassed by the reporting of th washington post that he sought advice from other lawyers an advisers on how he could kee documents, after being told by some in his team he could n
bowman is a former teacher himself. massie is not. and three, him telling bowman, a black man, to calm down is a best condescending, at worst racist oh, in bowman s outrage is o course, justified. of course he will come down. he is representing what hi constituents and people across the country are feeling righ now. ridge. a rage americans are justifiably angr about school shootings about the killing of our kids. and all of our lawmakers on th hill should be channeling that anger. and that no, my panel is bac with me. molly, let me start with you arming teachers is the ridiculous gop solution, the same teachers who they don t trust to teach our kids abou american history or se education. we give them guns. yeah. they don t trust the teacher to pick the box but they won t have guns. i mean, thomas massie is such good example of this kind of congress person. his whole goal is to make th government small enough so i can be drowned in a bathtub.
jack smith. he is running tw investigations that are very different in nature. one has t do with the oddity of keepin classified materials i mar-a-lago and the other o course is the much large investigation into january 6th and what he has done has bee to work his way up the totem pole here of witnesses and now he sits with the vice presiden getting testimony about what was going on in very, very confidential situations within the white house walls. i think at that point, once he has all of that evidence, he has to si down and merrick garland has t sit down and they have got t make really, really toug decisions here about whether either of those cases are goin to be brought, and there are reasons to bring either one of them, or not bring either on of them. that is going to be a really tough call for both jac smith and merrick garland. all right, former congresswoman donna edwards, thank you all so much. greatly
the rooftops, the windows, how do they even begin to do something like that. they will have a very extensive security presence, o course, outside the courtroo with everything from special operations personnel they will be monitoring online chatter. they are going look at hotel reservations that are coming in. the thing is a lot of thes groups are very active i propagating what they are goin to do and one of the fillers o january six was all of this wa out there to say that they did not act upon so they re going to be monitoring individuals who are going to be coming in an groups who are coming in as th individuals i worry more about so i would focus less abou what happens on tuesday, marjorie taylor greene is goin to be, there they were going t be a lot to perform with theater. but i am much more concerned about down the line. for example, what happens when the jury pool is chosen. and donald trump right now i making threats against the manhattan da what about the jurors. things like
impartial judicial system. and i think trump will b entitled to present his defens and have a day in court, and h may even be acquitted. let s talk about this particular case because ther were certain people involved i the payment of money to stormy daniels. there was stormy daniels, ther was michael cohen, there was david pecker from the publishe of the national enquirer, alle weisselberg may have had som involvement in this becaus they say that nothing happened with trump s money, bu weisselberg involved and o course, there is donald trump. one of the things donald trump has tried to do, not wit weisselberg and not with pecker, but with stormy daniels an michael cohen, is to undermine them, to target witnesses, t make their credibility, to mak them seem less credible in the eyes of the public i don t know if that s going t work with a jury well, i think we need t distinguish between the cour of public opinion and the cour of law trump plays in the court of public opinion and he