and my son isn t daycare, he is not old enough. yeah, no. no, if my son had been in there i would not have been outside i promise you that. if my son had been in there, she said, i would not have been outside. i promise you that. we spoke about employment by the school district last night with the guardian of a ten -year-old. he was in the school and he was murdered that day. someone has been holding a vigil outside the novelty school district office demanding answers. i ve been out here for 192 hours. my ask a simple, it is to suspend any officers that were there until an investigation is completed. and i have just gotten nothing but they run around. so, i mean i told him that i was not leaving and i m not going to. they haven t given you any answers?
this and didn t share it, it is also something that is necessarily troubling. it is also important to point out that there are many people from dps there that day. how many are actually be under investigation as we? now seven, seven have been referred. so, there were dozens? 91 dps. so, only seven people active in referred for investigation. she was one of them? she is one of them. and it s because of reactions. i went back and look at some of the video of her, it is really shocking. she even describes that day investigators of how she couldn t believe what was going on. and you can believe that there was an active shooter at one point. it was so quiet. you didn t hear kid screaming. you didn t hear kids yelling. you didn t hear kids crying. she couldn t believe the events that were unfolding. so, she describes not really understanding what was going on. but what was really shocking is that she basically spent her time kind of hiding behind the wall and behind another off
no sir, i had a meeting today which they offered to tell the officers off campus. but if you can do that, why can t you suspend them until the investigation is done? just 24 hours later, the officer is gone and we are joined now with more. what is the school district have to say about this? what is the reason that they are giving? the reason that they re giving anderson is because of that comment that she made about if her son was in the school she would not have been outside. so, that is the excuse for why they are firing her. they are not talking about the fact that there is this investigation of her. that is in part why they are firing her. so, again they re playing games. here they specifically said what she had said?
they said as we learn from a report last night, these comments she made they said it was distressful at very concerning. and that is why they were firing her. they make no mention of the fact that there was this investigation. and what is so troubling about that, we learn today from the dps her former employer, the uvalde school district in the police department actually reach out to them to go back and check on her when she applied for the job. they told the school that she was under investigation. wow, that was a question we didn t have an answer to last night. did involve the school district now that she was under investigation? since they are citing that comment from her, i just wanna replay that again. an officer asked of her children attend robb elementary. alessandro s response. my son is in daycare. he is not old enough. no, if my son had been in there i would not have been outside, i promise you that. a new reporting last night, there had been reports you can see
those terms are they sound technical. but in this case, what is being obstructed is a national security inquiry as well as a criminal investigation. and there are people whose lives are at stake. if their identity has been revealed in some of these top secret documents who are clearly marked. they were marked human resource. they were marching indicate that they would reveal the identity of the location at basically american spies abroad. they were marked to indicate signals of intelligence. so, this is very serious. and what i take these recent revelations to mean is that shortly after the midterm elections, indictments are likely to start flying. do you believe that the department of justice might actually invite the former president?