And to show you an example of the problem we are faced with what like to talk to you a little bad about a problem that we have in chesterfield county. The last six months of so we have been fighting the import of fly ash that would be used to build burns, to augment our soil for products that we use on ground and over 250 people came to our county to complain about this, to complain about water being polluted by the toxic chemicals and nothing has been done about it. The apartment of Energy Quality decided that fly ash is not toxic and will not hurt us and will allow the company to continue to import this. The reason we have to ask ourselves, airways are flooded, newspapers are flooded with articles and commercials basically talking about the nonsense about Global Warming. If we had regulations where going to affect jobs, benefits. And there really isnt a way for a foundation, educating people about the dangers of the environment. The here these repeated over and over again. So i am he
He doesnt know what year it is. The choice in 220. For all new homes, offices and buildings by 230. Has difficulty keeping his train of thought. Broadwalk. And if you think i am announcing my hes on an Obstacle Course that makes it look like hes not up for the job. Why are the Trump Supporters attacking donald trump . Its updated. Every time the attacks come you find more clips of donald trump just wandering around. I mean, you know, the Jonathan Swan interview by the way, i was off yesterday and missed the Jonathan Swan interview the part where he was with the charts and the graphs . Putting the papers in his face and the charts and the graphs. First of all, lets talk about Jonathan Swan for a second. You know when Chris Wallace comes at you, he has none chunks in one hand and clubs with spikes in another. And Jonathan Swan is more subtle, would you like a brownie, and you dont know what youve eat enuntil you wake up the next morning in the bottom of the elevator shaft. Hes sweet and
Committee. Keeping in mind that other cities have late last calls and many foreign visitors are used to late hours. Can you address the problem with last call as it relates to the problem with San Francisco as it strives to compete with tourism. Who would like to start . H . Why dont you start. Okay. Having an International Background and having lived in europe, i think it is paramount to the success if the future of San Franciscos image that we attract a Global Community to come here and entertain themselves and we have a quality of nightlife here that should support that. In my opinion, the 4 a. M. Law should be specific to particular businesses, quite frankly. I wouldnt want it for my own business, i wouldnt want it for elixir and it wouldnt apply for my corner and for my neighbors, but it could work on valencia street. It could work in areas where there are where its less likely to be disruptive to and that would help to broaden our spectrum on whether or not nightlife can support
Have some very strong opinions on surveillance cameras. Would you like to share . I would love to share. In 2010 there was an attempt to make it a law to have night clubs have Security Cameras and our mayor made a very clear statement that that was not something that our city wanted. Also, if the Police Department wants footage, there are legal ways to go about getting footage if it exist. Putting a condition on a permit to side step those laws, those processes, its not good for our community. If the Police Department wants to have cameras outside of my business, let them engage the community and let them do it themselves. Im not interested in participating in surveillance on my patrons. So, do you think that [ applause ] do you think that more businesses should bear the cost or not bear the cost of cameras instead of the city bearing the cost. I think the city should have cameras. There are places where that is useful. Having cameras near registers can save many dollars. If you believ
That is useful. Having cameras near registers can save many dollars. If you believe your clientele is potentially violent on damaging in terms of graffiti cost, you can have many reasons to have cameras. If a business wants to install their cameras and use them, they should bear that cost. If footage exist that Law Enforcement wants access to, there is a process that allows the Law Enforcement access to that. So, if a business wants to install cameras, absolutely they should bear the cost, but having Law Enforcement require cameras, that cost should not be passed onto the business. I have very mixed feelings about cameras but i tend to lean to what berry is talking about. We seem to be karening willie and nilly to this camera side. We are crossing the line now between reasonable, Video Surveillance in public being a reasonable part of the policing or Police Action and you get into the unreasonable police infringement of the 4th amendment. Let me read you one of these conditions so you