Authenticating patients for important drugs or for Online Banking month smartphones. Even systems that look under your skin so to speak such as infrared scanners that are used in vein matching oxygen poor blood in phoenix absorbs more in from around tissue so that vein patterns can be matched. Scientists are currently developing technology that can recognize a person on the basis of their heartbeat. Others are working on identifying a person by their brain waves. Sounds like biometrics super practical i no longer need those endless letter number and character password combinations happy days or is there a catch we talk to professor christoph minor to find out if teachers Internet Technologies and systems at a part of them based Research Institute was more secure of as a possible words or biometrics. Think up look is that we should be using your fingerprint to log in its obviously more convenient than you just put your finger on the reader are identified and then youre in. Thats much ea
A system registers my face and thats the bomb and know which customer is next in line ive never found my face war useful i use my fingerprint to unlock my phone and to get access to this high security area a computer 1st needs to scan my body movements biometrics i increasingly replacing typical passwords and access keys for example. Biometric systems can recognise a persons specific physical attributes their fingerprints facial features iris. The technology is already used around the world by the somali army indian doctors and for authenticating patients for important drugs or for Online Banking month smartphones. There are even systems that look under your skin so to speak such as infrared scanners that are used in fame matching oxygen for blood in phoenix absorbs more inferential light than surround. Tissue so the vein patterns can be matched. Scientists are currently developing technology that can recognize a person on the basis of their heartbeat. Others are working on identifying
Revived for 40 years during which time the Club Developed into the powerhouse in german football. On my lark thank you so much for your Company Everyone will begin in the us where the impeachment inquiry into us President Donald Trump has resumed with a 2nd day of public hearings on todays session centers on testimony from marie divonne of it while the former u. S. Ambassador to ukraine was fired from her post in kiev after coming under attack by trumps personal lawyer wouldve giuliani later she was branded bad news by donald trump and in her Opening Statements youve on a bitch said she had no agenda other than to. Pursue the us stated Foreign Policy goals take a listen individuals who apparently felt stymied by or press our efforts to promote stated us policy against corruption that is to do our mission were able to successfully conduct a campaign of december mission against a sitting them down using an official act. As various witnesses have recounted their share baseless allegations
Woodbine for 40 years during which time the Club Developed into the Powerhouse Team net german football. Thank you so much for your Company Everyone we begin this broadcast in the u. S. Where the impeachment inquiry into the president s donald trump has resumed with another day of public hearings while todays session centers on testimony from maria judge john of it while the former u. S. Ambassador to ukraine was fired from her post in kiev after coming under attack by trumps personal lawyer would also giuliani in some dramatic testimony today she told Committee Members she had felt intimidated by her treatment lets take a listen to an excerpt from murcia moments ago. What did you think when president trying told president selenski and you read that you were going to go through some things i didnt know what to think but i was very concerned were you concerned about. Shes going to go through some things it didnt sound good sounded like. A threat. Did you feel threatened i did all right
Variety like wharton business school, stanford, yale but i will talk about the impressions people have about guns and crime. Normally i would show you lots of graphs but im stymied on that with a technical issue but theres a lot of issues we can talk about. So just off the top of my head what we frequently hear about is that background checks and three. 5 million dangers for him people from gun. Everybody was to try to stop criminals or other people who might be dangerous from getting a gun. The problem is simply that isnt correct. Rather than saying three. 5 Million People have been stopped but what they should actually say is that there have been three and a half million initial denials. Almost all of those are mistakes. Its one thing to stop somebody its another just because they have a name that is similar to a felon. So for example the last full annual report put out on the background check system you had 76000 initial denials. Only 48 cases referred to prosecution and they got 13