bare bones bargain. if not, payments to critters, bill payments, you name it, there is not enough income to cover all that. every month we come up $125 billion short. if we cannot borrow to bridge the cap, 40% of the monthly obligations could not be paid, and that could include social security checks due to go out on august 3rd. the stakes we just laid out are monumental, so both sides have to give ground and risk their jobs for the good of the country. what is so hard about that, right? joining me with their insights on conflict resolution are cnn contributor, pete dominic, and family law attorney, mrs. winestein. what does it take for two entrenched parties to agree on a deal that both need? well, you know, the obvious is that you take the emotion out of the room and you try to deal with the practical. what we deal with is the practical and not the legal when we re trying to negotiate this. they re trying to take the politics out of the room and get to a solution that can
high. heads are on swivels. everyone has their responsibility and you re ratcheted up to your full potential there. reporter: here is the government account of what happens next. entering the compound, s.e.a.l.s come under fire and take out bin laden s courier and his wife. the s.e.a.l.s charge upstairs and run into bin laden s son. he is shot and killed. the forces advance to bin laden s third floor bedroom, shoot bin laden s wife in the leg, and then quickly fire at osama bin laden who falls dead. with the clock running, the commandos grabbed computers, data, a trove of information potentially about al qaeda s planning. they blow up their crippled helicopter and take bin laden s body with them as they get out of dodge with the help of their plan b backup helicopter. i can tell you exactly what they were thinking. they were thinking, hey, we did it. this went great. nobody was injured, nobody was killed from the good guys. we ve got the most sought after man in the world and i d
spending. we put a bill in front of the president. if the president as commander in chief doesn t want to fund our troops and keep the government open, that s something he ll have to explain to the voters. but do you think it boils down to social issues? should it boil down to this one sticking poyn,et we ve got the clock running on the screen. that s exactly right. i would point out to doug it s the democrats that proposed funding the military even if we went into a shutdown. secondly, this is not about spending cuts because both republicans and democrats are very, very close on the spending cuts. it is about one thing and one thing essentially, which is that the trick of these things is to come out with your base and the independents on your side. boehner has done exactly the opposite. he s painted himself into a corner where he has to choose between his base on the one hand and independents on the other side. by sticking to the social issues and making the social issues like fun
there s no equipment left. all this a hypothetical. what the judge ruled and the appellate court refused to interfere with was if you take a permit from someone, you have to define the deficiency. stated differently, something wrong with their well. you can t assume there s something wrong with their well because the bp well blew. neil: it can keep the clock running, right? at the present time there s this second moratorium imposed. at the time they filed the moratorium, they also filed an application before judge feldman to dismiss the case before him. which i suspect he ll deny and i suspect the bill oil will challenge this moratorium and he ll lift it again. neil: in the meantime there s no drilling. correct. they chased the drilling away. neil: that s my question. legally how many times at bat do you get? there s no actual hard and
technology for a weapon, how does the united states deal with that? because as the president said, as secretary gates said over the weekend, you may not have the intelligence to know whether or not they ve taken that material and turned it into a bomb. you just may not be able to see into that process. and if you don t know, do you have to you have to assume the worst case. you assume the worst case. this is the donald rumsfeld thing. if you don t know, you don t know. do you do what israel wants? do you support military action? or even if you don t do what israel wants, the israelis have a clock running at one speed. the united states has a clock running at another speed. because of their neighborhood, intelligence and warnings. this is exactly what netanyahu has been saying all along. it s an existential threat. one of the interesting things in the testimony this morning was that the folks who were testifying all said that they didn t know whether iran made a political