data out but we re going to let you have it because we favor your campaign. that turns it into potentially illegal contribution. tucker: how would that not be illegal and not be a crime. if they made this data available to nibble who wants it, well then, of course, any campaign to get it but the fact that they specifically had rules against this, does make it an inkind contribution. contrast this with what they did with cambridge analytica, remember, cambridge analytica when they found out about this, they went to cambridge analytica and said you need to destroy this data. you re not supposed to have it. that tells you that in the one case they let the campaign have it. in another case they were saying well, no, you are not supposed to have this data. tucker: so facebook, but also google and twitter and apple, the big tech companies could easily throw an election and we wouldn t know it and so we should be terrified of this. i don t think we are terrified enough. but, what is the
thing to a woman whose husband had been admit lid violent toward her. double standard. tucker: which reporter was that that said that. this was from a local tv station up in maine where i was working before my job at the white house. tucker: that s pretty shocking. obvious question is if your wife, ex-wife admitted using use violence against you and evidence there is. you denied used violence against her. no evidence that you did. why did you lose your job? well, because i worked for president trump in the white house. that s all there is too it. not even a question if that story would have run if i didn t work there. and president trump, thank god for him, at least, is calling out the media for their ongoing bias like few people are. on top of all of that, tucker, for my part, i passed a polygraph exam proving my innocence. the sitting government of govere
watch this. as someone who grew up in and barely escaped the holocaust my mother would say from time to time that it could happen here. what are your concerns about the stability of our democratic institutions and structures in these tumultuous moments? i worry about the degradation of institutions. i m more worried about whether our constitution is going to be honored. so i m hoping that the worst the question you asked me ruth would never get to that. it would require people turning up and voting in midterm elections. tucker: really worried about the constitution as try to invalidate the first two amendments to the bill of rights. there it is. he is a dictator. that s not a novel take on the left calling trump a
to hire the best people, i thought what is this country coming to, hiring people on the basis of relevant criteria like experience or skill, commitment, i mean, that s just wrong. and i think you would agree with that. no. we want people who are qualified and experienced. specialty hymn of ou hymn ofr nation s federal agency. we also need to make sure that those agencies reflect the growing diversity of our country. i m not just talking about racial diversity, i m talking about gender diversity and ethnic diversity at every turn with this administration we have seen efforts to turn the clock back. we know that diversity is not a priority for this administration whether we are talking about cabinet level appointments or judicial appointments. this administration is one that has not placed a premium on diversity. tucker: what do you think of the nfl? do you like the nfl? that s a totally different context. tucker: oh, it is. but do the same standards
tucker: in the past two years the media have adopted new principle if someone is connected to the current administration, that person can be targeted for destruction for any reason or no reason at all. and it s all virtuous because the president is evil. well, until last month, david sorensen was a speech writer in the white house and the washington post accused him of domestic violence. why did they do this? because of the word of his ex-wife. sorenson lost his job. he said the post had no evidence that he ever did anything wrong. the post had no court records, no police report. no evidence, no pictures, nothing. and now his life has been destroyed. david sorenson joins us tonight with his story. david, i want to say at the outset that we have never met. i have never spoken to you in my life before. this i don t know anything about your marriage and i don t even know your ex-wife s name. what struck me about this story, normally i would never get involved in anything like this