Im going to test them against the national interests, test them against principles and values, and what i and my advisers think is doable here. Then how do i address the probably . I think thats the way it would work, so its going to depend upon each specific issue that comes before the commander in chief. Im going to follow up in a second. I think its important for those who will be president to communication their vision of the Foreign Policy they intend to bring, and its important to do that in some detail. I hope we can have that during the course of this campaign. I think its important for the next president to communicate that with confidence, because as we both discussed here today, the United States is and has the resources to be the leading nation in the world and should be, and i think its required to lead leading nation in the world. I think its important for us to focus on Economic Growth, and i think there needs to be an important focus on allies. And the value this unique
Max page, when was the National Historic preservation act passed . Of 1966. R 16 what was the purpose of the act . nation oft was years of destruction of the culmination of years of destruction of national landmarks. It was the celebration of buildings and landscapes. Did it applied to buildings . To,page it did not have but it ended up focusing on our great works of architecture. It was associated with important parts of our history. Has that evolved since to protect other areas of our heritage . Mr. Page yes. That is one of the interesting things of the last 50 years. It has gone from being focused on things like where george slept too slips encompassing a much broader range of American History and cultures. That is one of the most exciting things that have gone on. There are now over 100,000 listings on the National Register of historic places. That register was created by the National Historic preservation act and exploded to worker housing and native american sites and dance halls
Need to think about direct job creation particularly in some of the communities that have been so hard hit. We could go on for a long time. And we even have questioners waiting, but weve reached our witching hour, and were going to have to quit. I want to thank david and gordon and their absent colleague, david dorn, not only for being with us today but for really doing the kind of indepth work on these issues that needed badly to be done, for having enriched really the country and the worlds understanding of these issues and therefore helping pave the way for policy changes that will help preserve the benefits of globalization. Were all deeply in your debt. We thank you for being with us today. Jared, thanks to you for your comments and policy advice. Thanks to the audience for being here. Meeting adjourned. Thanks very much. Coming up, next a discussion on islamist terrorism in europe. After that a House Transportation Committee hearing on the rising cost of federal Disaster Response
Though i do cover that in the first chapter. I want to take it through the rest of the 1960s. While we desegregated in 1963, we did not integrate. That took a long time, going even beyond 1970. But it is in this period that the University Went in a new direction. Once segregation was out of the way, once all that energy that had gone to trying to maintain and actually illegal and certainly immoral way of doing things, after all that energy could be sent in another direction, the university of alabama began to turn itself away from a regional Football Party school and warning itself and turning itself toward becoming a Major National academic institution. That is what it has become, but it was a long journey in the 1960s that sent us that in that direction. There were a lot of changes going on at the beginning of the 1960s. But really, it stems from 1956. At the first effort of desegregation, which failed horribly, accompanied by riots. This girl was a student for three days, but desegr
Only on cspan3. Welcome to real america, 40 years ago in the wake of watergate the United States senate created a commission to look into the u. S. Intelligence service. It is known as the Senate Select committee. It is best done as the Church Committee. The committee met for 60 months reviewing more than 10,000 documents and calling 800 witnesses. His legacy in includes the creation of the senate. Select intelligence committee. Intelligencegn surveillance act. New requirements for the executive branch to notify congress about his activities rate to go former staffers of the Church Committee are with us to provide context for the 40yearold video you are about to see. From new york, rich swarts. Here in our studio in washington is Elliot Maxwell who was counsel to the committee. Thanks to the both of you. This is our third installment of the series. Were looking at the Church Committee hearings on possible Illicit Activity of the fbi. Rich schwartz, november 18, 1975 you testified befor