is the are those reallyage o national defense information? you know, does doesthat s the release of that damage our national security? probably not. y woulvebut that s something thm the jury would have to decide. of course, you need unanimous team. po, i justd the most important t i just need a quick answer on it. you don t believhe rt e and one ofor the the reasons you re not with the team, you don t believe you re able to get the best advice of the president.wi th he s got too many knuckleheads around him blocking the best infon. rioto and you re not just talking about you. you re talking about other attorneys. has ng chang changed to make you think that the president s going to have access to the best legal advice possible ? i do not have contact with the current legal team , so i couldn t answer that question, unfortunately. all right. do you think hope? e for hi, fo i hope for his sake and for the country s sake, that he is able to get competent, all rh conflict free represent
special counsel. take a listen. this is called election interference and an attempt to rig and steal an election, a political persecution like something straight out of a fascist or communist nation. not only are you extremely involved in the reporting on the case, you covered his campaign every single day and survived. what s your take away after hearing that response? it s a loser of a message to say i took these documents with me and that s that. it s you versus me mentality. we ve seen that over and over again in his speeches. it is remarkable they settled on this as an election
i ve been thinking about this, as i often do. look at the reaction with e. jean carroll. he bank rolled off of it. there is something to be said, the jury pool in west palm beach versus one in washington, d.c. if you believe that an acquittal or a hung jury is in your future and have another instance to campaign off of or demonstrate this is a political witch-hunt. as an attorney i would counsel to elongate this calendar. but if there is some delusion that there is a guarantee, which is never the case, of an acquittal or guilty verdict, i bet that s factoring in to figure out when the calendar and the speed of trial would be. i ve been thinking about you thinking about this because i try to draft off whatever you
that s fabricated. if it did happen, let s see the proof. there s nothing that links this to anything political. i have to criticize all three prosecutors. by taking as long as they ve taken they ve contributed to this situation. he can say they re lobbing charges only after i ve announced my candidacy and the trial will land in 2024. we ll see what happens. she s the slowest of all. this could count against him for that very reason jack smith and team could go in and say we are anticipating this could be removal for 21 days and stand ready to try the case. it s going to be unrealistic but
documents with him and others were not prosecuted for doing the same thing. of course the prosecutors in the case argue that s not true, that he kept some of the nation s most sensitive documents and his unwillingness to hand them over amounts to obstruction. the second thing was his tone. he was surrounded by his most sympathetic supporters and fiercest allies. the type of environment to give off the public image that he s pushing back. he did sound angry and something his advisers picked up on. he did not linger after his remarks. he pretty immediately left the outdoor area and went back inside. the substance. my colleague and i spoke with some donald trump allies prior to his speech and they told us