Good afternoon. Im the appellant dr. Robert harris. Ill start with health issues. The Planning Commission did not properly apply the following sections of the planning code. Section 303, condition [inaudible]. When not be detrimental to the Health Safety or welfare of persons right residing in this vicinity. In response to this, the final motion to the height and bulk of the building accessibility, landscaping, they did mention preventing emissions. Just fine, but smoking has been prohibited since 1980s. By this conditional use, we are referring to the unhealthy effects of the [inaudible]. The cigarettes [inaudible] e cigarettes containing nicotine and the [inaudible] in the basement. In 2008 the board of so supervisors unanimously passed and that the fine tobacco to [inaudible]. The language disorder and supports our position. It states, tobacco paraphernalia excusing it states the gold this organization establishment. And related Health Safety and general welfare problems. In the cit
Ocean avenue commercial district. The conditional use Planning Commission 303 states in part, the proposed use will serve the neighborhood in whole or significant part and will not adversely affect the master plan and will provide the element that is in conformity with the stated purpose of the applicable neighborhood commercial district. Its important to place this project within its physical and demographic context. That context must include the balboa park station plan which was signed into legislation in 2009 as an area plan within the San Francisco general plan. The balboa plan was not included in the Planning Commission until two days before the november 6 commission hearing. President [inaudible] commented she was the more time for people analysis of essential to Planning Commission were not great challenges for the neighborhood. The ocean avenue and ct extends from keelan avenue to manor drive. 1963 ocean avenue is at the western end of this. The singlefamily neighborhood of Da
Includes nicotine. The San Francisco department of Public Health has consistently warned about the harmful effects of each cigarettes is seen in your fact sheets. I cant read it contains [inaudible] increase nicotine addiction among young people. These products have not been tested for safety or efficacy in helping people quit smoking. American Cancer Society Heart Association and American Lung association have their statements expressing the increase of ink e cigarette marketing and use. Those 23rd. 2014 from the department of Public Office and type of thing. Electronic cigarettes are still awaiting regulation from the food and drug administration. There are no set standards for production or content. Nicotine is a highly addictive since substance. And products you cigarettes have been tested positive for known tobaccorelated carcinogens, toxic chemicals and heavy metals. The second hand there are so expand expose poses bystanders or hazardous chemicals are not the Planning Commission
Shown [inaudible] the western half of ocean avenue has six businesses that sell businesses for which that so easy thats in a five block business. So highly impacted. I back there 37 tobacco districts in 37 [inaudible] and we all think we need another one. Caroling carols speaking for the appellant. The Planning Commission did not properly apply the general plan for the ocean avenue commercial district. The conditional use Planning Commission 303 states in part, the proposed use will serve the neighborhood in whole or significant part and will not adversely affect the master plan and will provide the element that is in conformity with the stated purpose of the applicable neighborhood commercial district. Its important to place this project within its physical and demographic context. That context must include the balboa park station plan which was signed into legislation in 2009 as an area plan within the San Francisco general plan. The balboa plan was not included in the Planning Commi
Appellates. From the lees. This is a letter for qualified support for the residential reconstruction at 312 green street. We have always assumed this small bungalow would be remodeled with an additional story. We have seen the expansions of the properties to the east of 312 green at 310 and 308 green street. The construction will have Significant Impact on the property but on balance we support it because the owners, bruno and suzanne kakter worked with us to mitigate the impacts and the light well and common roof deck would result from any expansion of the property. We have been meeting with them over the past year and they have been to our home to observe and discuss the concerns. Their latest plans respect and mitigate our concerns to the extent possible given theyre adding two floors to the building. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker please. I am a neighborhood friend, long time friend of bruno and a homeowner in north beach and being here today brings back memories when i had a d