right, because you re putting people into buckets. daverne, this radicalization has its own impacts. nine anti-abortion activists were it s harassment of either patients or providers. this weaponization of trauma and fear is becoming more tangible. that s right. we re very pleased with this case. it s a critical case, ali. what is happened is we ve had over 50 clinic invasions since 2017. it s a campaign designed to intimidate and terrorize providers and the patients they serve. this is a critical case.
stalking where they re following the doctors and employees to their homes, their clinics, emp hospitals, churches, the schools where their children go to school, to criminal threats, to death threats in letters, e-mails, phone calls, to actual violence where they re attacked, to clinic invasions, to bombings, arson, and murder. the most visible form of intimidation is something i don t feel very critical of. i feel like political speech, it s often a good sign when it s loud and raucous and confrontational. the issue with the anti-abortion movement using that as a tactic is not just the speech part of it but the attempt to intimidate people from using that type of service. how do you navigate that as someone who cares for first-amendment rights? the difference is when you
patients feel and hear what s going on outside. to actual stalking where they re following the doctors and the clinic employees to their homes, to their clinics, to their hospitals, to their churches, to the schools where their children go to school, to criminal threats to death threats in the forms of letters and e-mails, phone calls to actual violence where they re attacked, clinic invasions to bombings, arson and murder. the most visible form of intimidation is something that i don t feel very critical of. i feel like i m on a sort of first amendment elitist. i feel political speech is often a good sign when it is loud and raucous and noisy and confrontational but the issue with the antiabortion movement using that as a tactic is not just the speech part of it but the attempt to intimidate people from using that service. how do you navigate that and
forms of letters and e-mails, phone calls to actual violence where they re attacked, clinic invasions to bombings, arson and murder. the most visible form of intimidation is something that i don t feel very critical of. i feel like i m on a sort of first amendment elitist. i feel political speech is often a good sign when it is loud and raucous and noisy and confrontational but the issue with the antiabortion movement using that as a tactic is not just the speech part of it but the attempt to intimidate people from using that service. how do you navigate that and consider the two sides of that? i think the difference is when you have criminal conduct coupled with expression, i mean, no longer can these extremists