i understand the subject very well. i understand that water vapor is the key to impacting the co 2 increase on global warming and the climate. and all of these climate models, it doesn t matter how sophisticated a climate model is, it is not a crystal ball. you could learn more about the climate by throwing a bunch of bones on the ground than you could by these models, they are computer models, something you can t predict the future of the earth with. they re all saying the co 2 is going to result in a very large increase in the temperature. and the way they do that is by assuming the increase in the water vapor which will come in a warmer world will magnify the effect of the carbon dioxide, when in fact they don t know
attributed to it. that s my friend, charles cook s point here is the point, though. this is the point, right? this is a way, and you re right, we have to tell stories and we tell them with anecdotes. yes. point is that data out there that s being corrected, right, that just means nothing to people. what means something to people, and that s the reason the snow trollers are so gleeful, right? that s why drudge does this precisely for this reason because what means something to people is how does it affect me? when there s a drought, like in 2012, what we are saying when we cover that drought is this is what the world will look increasingly like. this is what we are edging into because the numbers mean nothing to people. so you are saying it s okay to use a drought which the federal government, the drought experts in the federal government said this is not caused by to say every climate model suggests we will have more droughts and that is going to ruin people s
the federal government you attributed to it and obama attributed to it. that s my friend, charles cook s point here is the point, though. this is the point, right? this is a way, and you re right, we have to tell stories and we tell them with anecdotes. yes. point is that data out there that s being corrected, right, that just means nothing to people. what means something to people, and that s the reason the snow trollers are so gleeful, right? that s why drudge does this precisely for this reason because what means something to people is how does it affect me? when there s a drought, like in 2012, what we are saying when we cover that drought is this is what the world will look increasingly like. this is what we are edging into because the numbers mean nothing to people. so you are saying it s okay to use a drought which the federal government, the drought experts in the federal government said this is not caused by to say every climate model suggests we will have more
think you can attribute the 2012 droughts to climate change. this noaa. the federal government you attributed to it and obama attributed to it. that s my friend, charles cook s point here is the point, though. this is the point, right? this is a way, and you re right, we have to tell stories and we tell them with anecdotes. yes. point is that data out there that s being corrected, right, that just means nothing to people. what means something to people, and that s the reason the snow trollers are so gleeful, right? that s why drudge does this precisely for this reason because what means something to people is how does it affect me? when there s a drought, like in 2012, what we are saying when we cover that drought is this is what the world will look increasingly like. this is what we are edging into because the numbers mean nothing to people. so you are saying it s okay to use a drought which the federal government, the drought experts in the federal government said this is
country right now. the added risk that s coming from the climate model that you re talking about, it s just way too much for people to be able to actually deal with. and the two are connected. what has to happen right now to make people s life better, number one, assistance in their recovery, but when you think about how to physically protect new york city from climate change, we also have to expangd that resiliency, we need to think about economic resiliency, low income folks and all of these actually obtain for example when we talk about building seawalls and bulkheads and all these other infrastructure projects, we could easily say that the jobs that are created go to these low income new yorkers who already suffering. we have talking about there s been some conversation about a huge seawall project in the