are fair to the united states and its workers, or to negotiate a new deal that protects our country and its taxpayers. [ applause ] so if the obstructionists want to get together with me, let make them non-obstructionists. now, again, the contradiction, he says he doesn t believe in climate change although two white house staffers were asked today and they wouldn t answer the question. but if he does believe in it, the science of it, then what s to negotiate? that s the number one question. but i think the idea that the white house won t say whether or not he doesn t agree with climate change, of course it s something that has been proven by scientists, but if you have to have that conversation, then there s nothing to negotiate. if you don t believe that the world is changing who is he talking to? he s talking to his supporters who want to think that the climate isn t changing because they want their coal-mile-per-houring jcoal
the left so far. the president is apparently angrying people on both sides. release on wednesday. the left doesn t like that he is going to tackle some of these entitlement things and obviously the g.o.p. doesn t like that they have heard that he wants more more tax increases. they say they have already given him that here is his press secretary on what the president s thinking is. what i will say is that this is not the president s idealized budget. it is not what he would do if he were king or if only people who supported his proposals were in congress. it is what he believes is a fair and balanced approach to our deficit challenges. one that allows us to address, to protect seniors. help secure and the middle class and give ladders to those who want to get into the middle class. clayton: i do like the term fair and balanced with jay carney. where did he get that from?
are open for everyone to enjoy. we ve shared what we ve learned, so we can all produce energy more safely. bp s also committed to america. we support nearly two-hundred-fifty thousand jobs and invest more here than anywhere else. we re working to fuel america for generations to come. our commitment has never been stronger. some brokerage firms are. but way too many aren t. why? because selling their funds makes them more money. which makes you wonder isn t that a conflict? search proprietary mutual funds. yikes! then go to e-trade. we ve got over 8,000 mutual funds, and not one of them has our name on it. we re in the business of finding the right investments for you. e-trade. less for us. more for you. the fund s prospectus contains its investment objectives, risks, charges, expenses, and other important information and should be read and considered carefully before investing. for a current prospectus, visit etrade.com/mutualfunds. [ merv ] mr. clean magic eraser extra power was t
however it, doesn t make sense to your point about the amount of spending they have already asked for and the amount of spending that congress went along with in that lane duck session after the new year after we were going off the fiscal cliff. there has been a large amount of new spending. of the president wanting more spending to offset the cost of these cuts to medicare and medicaid. tucker: wait a second. if he were king. he her the if he had total authority, is carney saying he wouldn t cut entitlements at all? he would repeal the laws of math? we are in trouble economically because of entitlements. there is no real major driver of our debt. medicare is the major federal expenditure? he wouldn t cut it at all. alisyn: that sowbz like what he is say. tucker: crazy. alisyn: wish list of how they see the world and what jay carney is saying that s not the case this year. this is the president actually compromising. this is the president doing something out of his comfort zo
another month with a lousy jobs report. tucker: labor force participation rate is the lowest since 197, the carter administration. yeah. tucker: that s not likely to be a media obsession for the next month, is it? i don t think so. it is interesting tucker when you look at the way the media covers the jobs picture when there is a republican president. we would be hearing if we had one right now. if we had george w. bush in office. i think we would be more likely to hear about a jobless recovery. seeing stories about how far corporate profits are higher and there are no jobs being created and it has something to do with government policy. but because you have obama in office, it doesn t quite fit that at this typical liberl narrative. you end up with more of just kind of wow, the economy is still bad, what can we do about it? or even the story that just says the unemployment rate came down. isn t that a good thing? i noticed that gay issues, gay marriage, civil unions, gays in