spender. i would point out in the interest of fairness, tom steyer, a wealthy guy is out doing environmental around climate change. he has a plant, he wants to seed $50 million and raise from like-minded friends, to josh s point, sort of directed giving. raise another $50 million to spend it on senate races in 2014 on the sort of climate change side of things. i think you re going to see more own more of it. you asked, are we going to see this in last two weeks? i would say we re seeing it now. americans for prosperity, koch brothers group spent millions of dollars against kay hagan already. we re just going to keep seeing it. here s that sound i mentioned from tom perkins. he s the guy that suggested maybe the power of your vote should be proportionate to the amount of money you make. this is the kind of attitude i think voters are up against in reality. here he is. the tom perkins system is you don t get to vote unless you pay a dollar of taxes. but what i really think is it shou
about this pipeline, but the first concern is clearly that, if we allow this pipeline to happen, we re going to be exacerbating climate change impacts in a way that we can t even predict. right now if we allow this pipeline to go forward, it s light lighting the fuse on the biggest tar sands carbon bomb ever. early sources indicate that this report at least will say that there s no significant environmental effect if it does, in fact, come out to be this. will it be a disappointment and will your fight to keep the pipeline from happening continue? tamron, i haven t seen the report yet. i know any credible report will tell us what countless experts have said, which is this has tremendous wildlife benefits, on the climate change side and the spill side. we ve seen many, many spills from these types of pipelines. any credible report has to mention those things. if the report comes back and again sources say it would say that the pipeline would have