He called the deal a onceinalifetime opportunity. Joining me now from washington is peter baker, the chief White House Correspondent of the new york times. Peter, tell me how you see the president s frame of mind reflected in part by Tom Friedmans interview as he strives to bring real probably the most important negotiations of his presidency. Peter i think that is exactly right. He sat down with tom friedman on saturday at the white house to pitch his deal and also to think in larger terms of what it could mean for the region. He clearly has this idea that if they can make this work, if they could finalize a deal in june and get past obstacles like congress, there is a chance to transform security in the region and perhaps even begins to change iran a little bit. He is not counting on that. He is realistic to understand that iran is a complicated country, as he put it. But, clearly he has ambitions to go beyond simply curbing its nuclear program. Charlie ambitions include what, do you
Joining me now from washington is peter baker, the chief White House Correspondent of the new york times. Peter, tell me how you see the president s frame of mind reflected in part by Tom Friedmans interview as he strives to bring real probably the most important negotiations of his presidency. Peter i think that is exactly right. He sat down with tom friedman on saturday at the white house to pitch his deal and also to think in larger terms of what it could mean for the region. He clearly has this idea that if they can make this work, if they could finalize a deal in june and get past obstacles like congress, there is a chance to transform security in the region and perhaps even begins to change iran a little bit. He is not counting on that. He is realistic to understand that iran is a complicated country, as he put it. But, clearly he has ambitions to go beyond simply curbing its nuclear program. Charlie ambitions include what, do you think . Peter he has argued that should the sanct
To the private sector and say this is what i think is coming at you. This is what it is going to look like. This is the precursor activities that will give you a sense of what is occurring. What i am interested for the private sector is did you see what we told you you were going to see . What did we miss . What worked out well . How did you configure your system . What were the telltale signs that told you something was coming . There are always advanced indicators well before you get to the final act, well before you get to the destructive act. There are always precursor steps that give you a sense of what is coming at you. Im interested in what are you saying . What are the things we failed to anticipate question mark hey, i would like to see this malware because i am interested in tearing it apart and developing counters so we can defeated in the feet it in the future. Not just you, but us, more broadly in the private sector. I am interested in the signatures that help the system r
House to defund it, to derail it, in one way or another before they had a chance to do that some judge in texas ruled it unconstitutional and if its on hold until this appeal because the higher court and hopefully that will be overturned. Unfortunately, even if it is overturned, its only a temporary fix because it doesnt provide legalization or path to citizenship it just says for x. Amount of months you can get the work permit and drivers license and be in that country without legal status. Thats not a permanent solution but we support it and we think that the president did have the authority to do that and its a good temporary stopgap measure. But what we do need and we cant do it without congress, we do need a fix to a broken immigration system. The catholic bishops have the same for the past ten plus years that Immigration Reform should have three legs. One leg is the path to citizenship for the 11 million or so that are here in this country. These people are already part of our so
Keeping that pipeline open is good. I do not have insight into exactly where it is going. They are working with other openings for replacements for the rd 180. Working in a way that does not just declare, no more. Keeping assets and the pipeline open as long as we can. Senator cruz do you have thoughts on these questions . It depends where you think the immediate risks are. If you thought there was a risk tomorrow or today, the answer is, we have the inventory we have. Beyond that inventory, if your next bet you have an option. Ultimately, the option is to have a u. S. Source. The proposals for building a replacement engine, the numbers i have heard have been on the order of 34 years to do that. Perhaps that could be accelerated a little bit. I think there are parts you cannot accelerate. You are talking 34 years. If you think the crisis with russia is not going to go away is going to be with us for some time to come, the answer in my view is to Begin Development of that engine and to