0 those videos? i am not sure i am supposed to tell you thoses. but it s clear from the body of evidence that there was no protest at the temporary facility. and that there was a a lot of activity going on, but it wasn t protest, it wasn t demonstration, it was a terrorist attack t. should have been labeled as a terrorist attack from the very start. these people hate us. toy to try to morph this into something it wasn t, we need to ask the president, why did he do that? colonel north, if the state department s watching in realtime and general petraeus knew almost instantaneously, i ask you, is it possible, is it plausible, the president of the united states, who met an hour and 18 minutes after the attack began, with one of his generals and with with secretary of defense panetta is it possible two weeks later he didn t know? yes. because incompetence, manevulence and misfeasance have been boundless in this administration. it is entirely possible that this president has not
attacks. we have yet to discover who has changed the talking points to make the president look for favorable and mislead you, by falsely labeling the 9/11 attacks over spontaneous mob over the video. petraeus has no idea what was provided to rice or who was the author of the talking points that she used that, he had no idea she was going on the talk shows until the white house announced it one or two days before. now, the looming question is, in this coverup, who did it? now, earlier, fox s own katherineererridge explained where the talking points went once they left the cia. what we are told about the talking points is that it went through an inter-agency review, including the department of justice, the state department, agencies and that at the end of the day you have this final document. sean: general petraeus explosive testimony challenging the white house s stance on what happened from the beginning. and it contradicts u.n. ambassador susan rice, who five days after
attacks. we have yet to discover who has changed the talking points to make the president look for favorable and mislead you, by falsely labeling the 9/11 attacks over spontaneous mob over the video. petraeus has no idea what was provided to rice or who was the author of the talking points that she used that, he had no idea she was going on the talk shows until the white house announced it one or two days before. now, the looming question is, in this coverup, who did it? now, earlier, fox s own katherineererridge explained where the talking points went once they left the cia. what we are told about the talking points is that it went through an inter-agency review, including the department of justice, the state department, other intelligence agencies and that at the end of the day you have this final document. sean: general petraeus explosive testimony challenging the white house s stance on what happened from the beginning. and it contradicts u.n. ambassador susan rice,