the burden to the states. we are right now. if we stick the status quo way of thinking of things specially when it comes to healthcare programs from the government we can t continue on this path. dagen: we can look for the granny off the cliff ads. you won t have to wait long. dagen: neil cavuto 20 minutes from now, charles payne, what have you got? the fed hiking rates again and promising more hikes are coming. throwing cold water on president trump s plan to ease the economy. to cut federal funds in sanctuary cities. we find out the us has 500 of them. time to make good on that threat. we will debate it at the bottom of the hour. dagen: we can t wait. forget president trump s leaked
and if the republicans can associate with that they could make some headway. they care about medicare and the los angeles times has an arm out today, paul ryan is going to reintroduce as part of the republican budget, the vouchers for everyone under 56 years old for medicare. that already has been proven to be a political loser. it is hari-kari. it was in the middle of a vigorous campaign and maybe it wasn t sold correctly. i call it insanity, the definition of which is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. it was proven in the campaign it didn t work. ryan did not add to the ticket and to go back to that when they are losing on medicare is a losing. gregg: he was demagogued with granny-over-the cliff ads. the republican for the
from democrats you talked to? democrats couldn t be happier with this pick. if if you think about it from a politically strategic point of view this is not about florida this is not about ohio this is not about virginia, president obama leads right now in wisconsin and it doesn t look like it s really seriously in play. maybe paul ryan can change that. but i don t know. right now that s not an issue. on the larger scale what people are looking at is this they are saying what about appeals to independent voters. given paul ryan s records the cliff ads business about medicare social security. he opens lots of lines with potential attacks on democrats. the other thing he needs to consider is seniors. when they look at social security you can image it is democrats are going to use his