well, i think you put your finger on it, ari. the import is that back in may of 2011, my client sat in a room in las vegas with a licensed polygraph examiner. was given a polygraph examine, and she passed with flying colors. i do want to correct one thing. the three questions you put up, she passed the first two. it was determined she was telling the truth. as to the third, as to whether she was promised a spot on the apprentice, the polygraph examiner concluded that it was inconclusive. so he did not conclude she was telling the truth. he did not conclude she was lying. it was inconclusive. you know that i strive to be very accurate as it relates to the information that comes out. and so when i see something that is not quite right, i want to make it known. so that was the detail. appreciate that nuance. it is a nuance, but it s important. because we don t want the get over the tips of our skis. but i think it s important
the examiner asserting she passed the test clearly. lawyer avanatti says he paid for the tape. we caught wind of the fact there were a number of main party, some in the mainstream media that were attempting to purchase the video and the file for use in what i will describe as nefarious activities. that very lawyer in the eye of the storm joins me now. michael avenatti. thanks for being here. thanks for having me. this case stays in the news, partly because there seems to be new evidence that comes out. for new viewers, what is the import of it? well, i think you put your finger on it, ari. the import is that back in may of 2011, my client sat in a room in las vegas with a licensed polygraph examiner. was given a polygraph examine, and she passed with flying colors. i do want to correct one thing. the three questions you put up, she passed the first two. it was determined she was