protecting the livelihoods of the cops who killed freddie gray or watch baltimore burn to the ground. what exactly were you trying to say when you wrote that? i was saying that the citizens of baltimore feel disenfranchised and cheated. the freddie gray case it s an open and shut case. fy broke a guy s neck it wouldn t take this long to lock me up. especially if the guy died of murder. you ll i m saying is that these people here feel frustrated and we re angry and i would never condone violence i don t think violence is the answer or the key, but i m saying these people are acting that way because they feel like a lopsided justice system isn t working for them. the only reason why i used the words burn to the ground when i wrote those words my city that i love was on fire. to dee s point there is a history for the baltimore police of aggressive behavior right? fbi says officers have killed 127 people over two decades. that s more than other cities of the same size. they ve paid $6
but we re not staying in the kitchen. just start the slow cooker, add meat and pour in campbell s slow cooker sauce. by the time you get home, dinner is practically done. and absolutely delicious. everyone is cooking with new campbell s slow cooker sauces. the jury in the michael dunn loud music murder trial, a case that s brought florida s stand your ground law back in the spotlight has now been deliberating 28 hours. while that s longer than the zimmerman jury took to return a not guilty verdict, there are no clues as to how they ll decide. yesterday it was thought there might be a hint when the jury asked if they could reach a verdict on not all of the
may have gone off the rails. the idea is it s not fear for shareholders and employees of a corporation to be punished if it s the corporation itself that s messed up. she s have all been controversial. even regular prosecutions of ordinary citizens, other people are affected, like families and communities. so a lot of us wonder why doesn t this apply to everyone, why just corporations? what it does, the prosecutor gets to work out this deal where he defers prosecution, really says he won t bring the case if the corporation does what he wants, which is often to pay a lot of money, pay some kind of fine. one of reports indicates the way mr. christie engaged in this behavior resulted in a change in the rules down in washington, d.c. karen, it s unbelievable. he hooked up folks as a prosecutor. he hooked up seton hall with $5
next case. it doesn t make. these are prosecutors that are afraid to talk about racism in the courtroom. they had racist letters from prison written by the defendant, signed by him. they didn t do that. they had neighbors who could talk about his use of the n word, his threatening women allegedly. they did do that. these are prosecutor who is put on a case their philosophy is put it all up there, see what sticks and see what the jury is going to do instead of vigorously arguing the case, really going for blood, really trying to put it away in closing argument the way it should be. they lost the zimmerman case. it doesn t look good on the top charge. ken, to this point it, does strike me that this prosecuting team, the pressure was on and particularly given, as lisa has said and many i think felt that the zimmerman case was a winnable case, we can debate that. but point being, the stakes were pretty high for angela cory and
applies and does that have to apply to other counts. we can surmise from that kind of question that they may be leaning towards a not guilty verdict on count one. we re looking at live pictures here from the jury room. i want to make sure our audience understands. yesterday the question was can we find on one and not all five? now it sounds like they re getting more specific to the one count and what do we make of the other four counts at this point? right. the question the latest question is to the judge and the judge speculated out loud, the question was if there is in fact a finding of self-defense, does that have to apply to all the other counts? and the answer from the judge is no, you have to look at each individual count and make a determination as to whether or not the self-defense applies based on the law and the facts in the case. so they have to look at each count separately. but that questions kind of suggests that the highest count,