client privilege. in another blow to trump, judge how also ruled in another case that some of trump s closest aides including ex chief of staff mark meadows must testify before a grand jury investigating his involvement in efforts to overturn the 2020 election. the judge rejected trump s argument that executive privilege from having to testify. and in new york, we came and went without an arrest in the stormy daniels hush money case. amid trump s unsubstantiated and baseless claims that it was going to happen on tuesday. but the threats against unhappiness returnee alvin bragg are mounting. the fbi and the nypd are now investigating a death threat containing a small amount of white powder. the substance was later deemed not dangerous. but it comes as trump escalates this rhetoric against the da, wanting warning against potential death and destruction if he is charged. i spoke with michael cohen s lawyer about this on my show earlier. take a listen. my client michael coh
i am live in for a man multi dean. coming up this hour, of time for trump as the manhattan da closes in, they deadlock to claims of hoodwinked, into other legal battles. plus, the lawsuit complicating foxes case against dominion voting system. and, the most important election of the year, i will talk with the chair of wisconsin s democratic party on the upcoming supreme court race that could affect everything, from reproductive rights to the 2024 presidential election and more. that s get started! we have a lot of developments to get to in the ongoing criminal investigation into the former president, donald trump. we re gonna get started right here in washington d.c.. where trump s lawyer, evan cochrane, testified yesterday before a grand jury investigating the handling of classified of government documents. ordered cochrane to testify, after rolling special counsel jack smith presented enough evidence to establish that trump may have committed a crime through his lawye
she says she will never prejudge a clay case, their own personal values are that abortion should be a decision made by the person who is pregnant. not by a politician. and that means that for voters, what we are hearing from them is that as you knock on doors, even in this astonished snow today. we are hearing from people that that basic question of personal freedom, bodily autonomy is being the most important issue in this election. if we win it will be because people struck a blow for freedom and democracy. and that really is in defiance of a right-wing that is trying to divide us using racialized fear to try to get a mostly white state to vote based on their worst instincts instead of their best instincts. i think they re wisconsinites are going to rise up to this, live up to this moment and elected janet on april 4th. but we have got to take nothing for granted in the final stretch. i have been saying for over a year now that wisconsin is ground zero for the battleground for
and do you think that voters in the state know the various perspectives of the two candidates on the ballot on this issue? yeah, so striking. even the proposal you just described. some republicans put forward immediately directed to the republican party said no. no exceptions for rape or for incest. there are far-right groups that have endorsed dan kelly, the republican supreme court candidate who wanted to eliminate the exception for the life of the mother that was included in the law in 1849 before women have the right to vote. when the span was first passed. dan kelly provided legal counsel to a group called wisconsin right to life. a far-right anti abortion group that is pouring millions of dollars into his campaign, where they re along with the election and analysts. the stakes are huge. the state has been very clear, she says she will never prejudge a clay case, their own personal values are that abortion should be a decision made by the person who is pregnant. not by a politic