about that is that that evidence has been in the possession of the government at the time of the court-martial and at the time leading up to the court-martial. we think that had that evidence been presented to the chain of command and to the and/or the jury, that they may never have had a court-martial or had we had a court-martial, that the outcome with have been entirely different. john, general richard clark was a well regarded general, head of the 82nd airborne, a great soldier is going to make the ultimate decision under the cold of military justice. why is this case particularly suited to clemency, this allegation there was not disclosure of terror ties. there was a failure to disclose evidence that it was an unfair trial, that there was a lack of due process. why is this particular case involving lieutenant lorance suited for clemency? i think that is the question for this case. it strikes at the very heart of clemency. that being major general clark con congratulations