built this wealth together, her rights were violated. so there are many people who may agree with traditional marriage as people define it but feel they don t have the right to have an unequal situation with others and, therefore, define for them their life. my battle with brian is not over marriage. my battle is he doesn t have the right to impose his definition of marriage and therefore make inequality on other people. can you, peggy, can society handle the court basically agreeing with both of them that, okay, you have traditional a traditional view of marriage but somebody in a same-sex civil union or marriage shouldn t be denied the rights that married couples between men and women get when it comes to financial situations and things like that? people were thinking in the past few years the civil partnerships, not marriage, but legal civil partnerships that conferred the protection sought by the woman who brought the
agree with traditional marriage as people define it but feel they don t have the right to have an unequal situation with others and, therefore, define for them their life. my battle with brian is not over marriage. my battle is he doesn t have the right to impose his definition of marriage and therefore make inequality on other people. can you, peggy, can society handle the court basically agreeing with both of them that, okay, you have traditional a traditional view of marriage but somebody in a same-sex civil union or marriage shouldn t be denied the rights that married couples between men and women get when it comes to financial situations and things like that? people were thinking in the past few years the civil partnerships, not marriage, but legal civil partnerships that conferred the protection sought by the woman who brought the suit might be a preferable way to go. but that s a legal question.
agreeing with both of them that, okay, you have traditional a traditional view of marriage but somebody in a same-sex civil union or marriage shouldn t be denied the rights that married couples between men and women get when it comes to financial situations and things like that? people were thinking in the past few years the civil partnerships, not marriage, but legal civil partnerships that conferred the protections sought by the woman who brought the suit might be a preferable ray to go, but that s a legal question. i m not really qualified to speak of it. but two things struck me about the past few days in the court. one savannah that this is an epic, big, cultural debate that s supposed to be happening. and yet it was a short, sometimes weirdly comic sort of shallow debate. did you find it that way? i mean, i was really struck that they were not talking about big issues but sort of dumb stuff that you talk about in college dorms. forgive me.