Dfcu) in the
Industrial Court for a declaration that her termination was
wrongful and unfair.
The Industrial Court determined the matter in favour of Kamuli,
but Dfcu then filed an appeal in the Court of Appeal seeking an
order that the judgement be set aside.
The Court of Appeal decided in favour of the Dfcu after which
Kamuli filed a notice of appeal to the Court. In response Dfcu
filed an application seeking an order to strike out the Kamuli
notice of appeal on grounds that it was not provided for in
law.
For an applicant to succeed under Rule 78 of the Court rules,