Meeting remotely. Members of the public who are calling in, the number is 4156550001. Access code, 24855929788. Followed by password 7221. Press pound then pound govern and added to the pound and added to the line and listening mode only. When your item of interest coming up, dial star three to be added to the speaker line. If you dial star three before Public Comment, youll be added to queue. When its your time to speak, youll be prompted to do so and Public Comment is limited to three minutes per speaker and an alarm will sound when finished and speakers are requested but not required to statement their names. Sfgovtv, show the office of Small Business slide. Today shg well begin with a reminder that the Small Business commission is the public forum to voice your opinions and concerns of policies that voice in San Francisco. Before item one is called, i would like to thank Media Services and sfgovtv for coordinating this virtual hearing and helping to run this meeting. Call item one,
Streets by people who recognize the street is narrow to make it all most untraversable. They would come up to sussex street and by the time they are diverted two blocks out of the way, they are not pleased with their situation and they are not driving safely and i have seen a lot of near misses on sussex street. Chenry street is a throughstreet. It has two dedicated lanes. It was always the emergency route so now if there are emergencies with the slow street, the emergency vehicles have to take a longer time to get to where they need to go because they are diverted but cant go down the narrow streets. I actually agree with a lot of the people who were talking about slow streets that they actually are not as safe as they are proported to be and would not let my kids ride the bike down the middle of chenry because i would be worried cars angry cars would come down. Please think before you vote for chenry slow streets. Thank you. Thank you for being here. Next speaker, please. I have maps
Should point out there are 2 other members of the group from puc may be chiming in on this. A compliance manager with Natural Resources jessica supervising biologist with the same group. So, i am back after quite a lot of discussion on this topic and went on to talk about charlie mercifully brief good i know the hour is late. Im going to go into the specific changes to those restrictions that we have come up with that are before you. Im not that go through the ones you party scene at the last meeting. Ill explain a little bit about what is behind those. Also, heres a summary of the Major Concerns that came out with the public and the various submissions and conversations we had and then im asked major City Partners to join me from the airport Public Utilities Commission Parks and recreation and public works. Then finally give you a little idea what sort of timeline lies ahead in our program. We thanks to debbie, we like to talk about things in terms of the why, why were doing this in s
Of constituents including the supervisors in each of these districts. It may make sense to prioritize theme. We are making progress on the other Properties Listed on the program. As you know, there isnt a time sensitive nature other than trying to get them to you in a timely manner. Here the property or the tennants and own done some of the legwork for us and we may want to capitalize on that since we can move these forward a lot more quickly than oochlts it it is good to have that already done. I agree. The landmark designation, that is for the work program exclusively, right . Because the is survey is under a separate category, its still under the work program. That is correct. Then we have 1. 5 for the privately initiated. We have 1. 15 for our work program, basically. Is that a correct reading of that . Yes. For the line no. 5 item for that budget for the Historic Fund Preservation Committee project. We have work in excess of that fine committee. A small portion used by that alloca
Talk about this again we weigh out what resources are available for a project. Is there someone involved to help this move forward. We did this before and we had commissioner alumni martinez here and did this before as we figure out how to get this off the list and which have the resources on a volunteer basis from the public. Eye i would suggest we add it to the list and not add additional staff time. Would you mind if we move to september. Fine. Thank you. With that well close for these two items and if we could then, because we have a conflict. I make a motion to recuse commissioner pearlman. Second. There is a motion and a second. Commissioner hyland, yes, commissioner johnck, yes, john, yes, commissioner matsuda, pearlman, commissioner hasz, that passes 70. We heard and did not comment on the 199 carl situation. Do we have any questions for staff at this time . Seeing none. Public comment on 199 carl . Seeing none, well close public comment. And commissioners, i imagine well do th