Procedures in c369913. So the whole thing in my opinion is moot. I believe that miss herrick, may have also have wrongly claimed that the california evidence code 1040, and its definition of official information, may have been misquoted and she may have incorrectly relied on deputy City Attorney improper letter to the Sunshine Ordinance Task force in which he wrongly combined two or three of dr. Derek kurrs complaints under one ball of wax wrongly. He made a mistake when he did that. In section 1040 is not whether disclosure is permitted, it is whether disclosure is forbidden. Jerry made that lettering error. How a deputy City Attorney can confound forbidden can permitted and then, deputy City Attorney herrick fell into the same mix is really disturbing. Let me ask you about that mr. Hau. Because c369913, appears to use the term to the extent permitted by state law. I draw your attention, commissioner hur to section 1040 b. Im assuming that state law takes precedence over 69913. I woul
Of which allenby who has served as the Iranian Ambassador to the eu into a tree limb says he was not involved in the takeover of the us embassy. The only translated for some students that us law allows the government to bar un diplomats were considered National Security threats washingtons potentially has been sitting stamp co the United States to criticism and early eighties using its position as host nation to properly exert political influence. Is you watch has issued a travel warning for its citizens traveling abroad especially those going to countries with extradition agreements with the U S Foreign Ministry has said that washington is on to them. This is the back of the korean invasion. Muscular previously protested in washington against the extradition of russian citizens from countries with which to us as bilateral extradition treaty with russia is likely it is sure to watch the tree to catch a ukrainian businessman who made millions of dollars from imported russian natural gas
Derek kurrs complaints under one ball of wax wrongly. He made a mistake when he did that. In section 1040 is not whether disclosure is permitted, it is whether disclosure is forbidden. Jerry made that lettering error. How a deputy City Attorney can confound forbidden can permitted and then, deputy City Attorney herrick fell into the same mix is really disturbing. Let me ask you about that mr. Hau. Because c369913, appears to use the term to the extent permitted by state law. I draw your attention, commissioner hur to section 1040 b. Im assuming that state law takes precedence over 69913. I would assume, sir, that you would know that 1040 should take precedence over the city charters or this particular government conduct code which is not even at the city charter level, if i am right. 1040 b, clearly states, a Public Entity is a privilege to refuse to disclose official information. Unless disclosure is forbidden. There is nothing in the act of the u. S. Congress or any other statue that
Procedures in c369913. So the whole thing in my opinion is moot. I believe that miss herrick, may have also have wrongly claimed that the california evidence code 1040, and its definition of official information, may have been misquoted and she may have incorrectly relied on deputy City Attorney improper letter to the Sunshine Ordinance Task force in which he wrongly combined two or three of dr. Derek kurrs complaints under one ball of wax wrongly. He made a mistake when he did that. In section 1040 is not whether disclosure is permitted, it is whether disclosure is forbidden. Jerry made that lettering error. How a deputy City Attorney can confound forbidden can permitted and then, deputy City Attorney herrick fell into the same mix is really disturbing. Let me ask you about that mr. Hau. Because c369913, appears to use the term to the extent permitted by state law. I draw your attention, commissioner hur to section 1040 b. Im assuming that state law takes precedence over 69913. I woul
Interest, or government ethics laws, regulations. The difference between them is that the complaints can be filed under 4. 105 a. Alleging many different violations of improper activities but under 4. 105 d, not all of them are investigated pursuant to procedures in c369913. So the whole thing in my opinion is moot. I believe that miss herrick, may have also have wrongly claimed that the california evidence code 1040, and its definition of official information, may have been misquoted and she may have incorrectly relied on deputy City Attorney improper letter to the Sunshine Ordinance Task force in which he wrongly combined two or three of dr. Derek kurrs complaints under one ball of wax wrongly. He made a mistake when he did that. In section 1040 is not whether disclosure is permitted, it is whether disclosure is forbidden. Jerry made that lettering error. How a deputy City Attorney can confound forbidden can permitted and then, deputy City Attorney herrick fell into the same mix is r