Him supporting the project. I have been in the city many years. I dont property since 1977, renovated my own homes and other properties in the city, and hope to do that again this time. Certainly available for any questions and i want to turn it over to williamof the pelosi [inaudible] good evening just want to be real quick. Closing law Group Representing the project sponsor and just want to say we have revised the application and with this revision we took the project does meet the standards the criteria for the demolition and city housing policies and freeways. One, were adding a third unit and storing the existing two and journaling the same location at the project doesnt displace any temp. Was vacant when purchase is been Owner Occupied for 40 years prior and the second unit had been as far as we know not rented for at least 10 years. Finally its doing its infill location thats consistent with the neighborhood and in general same massing and adding a third unit. With that i hope y
Him supporting the project. I have been in the city many years. I dont property since 1977, renovated my own homes and other properties in the city, and hope to do that again this time. Certainly available for any questions and i want to turn it over to williamof the pelosi [inaudible] good evening just want to be real quick. Closing law Group Representing the project sponsor and just want to say we have revised the application and with this revision we took the project does meet the standards the criteria for the demolition and city housing policies and freeways. One, were adding a third unit and storing the existing two and journaling the same location at the project doesnt displace any temp. Was vacant when purchase is been Owner Occupied for 40 years prior and the second unit had been as far as we know not rented for at least 10 years. Finally its doing its infill location thats consistent with the neighborhood and in general same massing and adding a third unit. With that i hope y
Him supporting the project. I have been in the city many years. I dont property since 1977, renovated my own homes and other properties in the city, and hope to do that again this time. Certainly available for any questions and i want to turn it over to williamof the pelosi [inaudible] good evening just want to be real quick. Closing law Group Representing the project sponsor and just want to say we have revised the application and with this revision we took the project does meet the standards the criteria for the demolition and city housing policies and freeways. One, were adding a third unit and storing the existing two and journaling the same location at the project doesnt displace any temp. Was vacant when purchase is been Owner Occupied for 40 years prior and the second unit had been as far as we know not rented for at least 10 years. Finally its doing its infill location thats consistent with the neighborhood and in general same massing and adding a third unit. With that i hope y
System they use it is everybody on the then computer modeling you really have flexible to have flexible a very good knowledge of structural behavior and a good knowledge about matching precise exact as possible to the real structure and that really take a lot of knowledge in engineering so at the time i told them i wanted people to review the modeling we dont have flexible that kind of expertise in the department they finally agree. Mr. Tom in reality isnt it true that the department as a as a matter of law have the ability to subject anything to outside party review. Not really just like supervisor you have flexible to the ordinance we have flexible the ordinance and put it in a cod and able to use it for certain buildings in a slope area that we can have a pay review if we dont have flexible that kind of ordinance in the Building Code we cant choices we feel not under the code so it is not really proper for us to force people you need to review that. Mr. Tom isnt there a provision of
Some of the solutions in the option 3 we have sufficiently balanced the interests were not suggesting that officers should never be able to view the video and not suggesting we distrust them im mindful of some of the documents i did of these olden to me in one of the comments the officers made i troubled me i want to go back some of the reports do indicate drove are harm caused by distrust starting with the policy we distrust your Police Officers one of the pieces from the experts there is a detrimental that blocking the information bound to send offers a message of distrust i want to say tonight this decision around option 3 not to send a motioning message of distrust but identify this is an investigations investigations are fluid and need to have safeguards in place colleagues, any followup before i entertain a commission. Commissioner dejesus. The audit is a critical part in investigation 3 it is new and should have a timeframe for that audit 6 months or 8 months or a year a timefra