Gresham neighborhood fights to save hundreds of trees planned for removal by development
A potential housing development will wipe out more than 260 long-standing Douglas Fir trees along with some animal habitats. Author: Keely Chalmers (KGW) Updated: 1:26 PM PST February 11, 2021
GRESHAM, Ore. Save the trees! That s what many in Gresham are chanting these days after getting news that a potential housing development will wipe out more than 260 long-standing Douglas Fir trees along with some key animal habitat.
It s habitat several groups are fighting to save.
The area at the center of the controversy consists of roughly 8 acres along the 3500 block of West Powell Boulevard in Gresham. The hundreds of trees are what drew first-time home buyers Cason and Philip Wolcott to the neighborhood adjacent to it.
be in disappearing ink. that s what it is, disappearing ink. it s not disappearing ink. i call it newt romney. michael steele, thank you. cindy tucker, have a nice weekend. we ll be enjoying that 7.8% unemployment rate. i m sure you ll be celebrating it. thank you. by the way, they re talking about cutting for big burden. that s not going very well. wait until you hear what rick santorum wants to hear with big bird. you can guess. this is hardball. he wants to home school big bird i guess. anyway, this is hardball, the place for politics.
elections there s everything you say shouldn t be in disappearing ink. that s what it is, disappearing ink. it s not disappearing ink. i call it newt romney. michael steele, thank you. cindy tucker, have a nice weekend. we ll be enjoying that 7.8% unemployment rate. i m sure you ll be celebrating it. thank you. by the way, they re talking about cutting for big bird. that s not going very well. wait until you hear what rick santorum wants to do with big bird. you can guess. this is hardball. he wants to home school big bird, i guess. anyway, this is hardball, the place for politics. ah.
0 since the campaign began, we ve known the power of the unemployment figure. now we have the number itself. plus, the good news about the last two months, it s clear that the economy created more jobs than previously estimated. there are some people out there who don t like this number, don t like it at all, and leading the band is the legendary ceo of general electric, jack welch, who joins us right now. jack, you made a lot of news today. here is the tweet you put out this morning. unbelievable jobs numbers. these chicago guys will do anything. can t debate so change numbers. and i m just wondering, i understand the way it works is the president gets a heads-up on the unemployment number 4:00 the day before and has to keep it to himself. you re saying in your tweet this morning that the news went the other way, that the people working for the president somehow got the bls, the bureau of labor statistics, and played with the numbers so it would come down below 8% today. how does it w
0 you do a tweet now after the power you used to have. i mean, tweeting, doesn t seem like something i d hear from jack welch and i mean it. here you put out the word, unbelievable jobs number, fair enough. these chicago guys will do anything so they changed the numbers. what evidence do you have that they got to the bls? i have no that the chicago guys got to the bureau of labor statistics and jimmied these numbers by 0.3%. i have no evidence to prove that. i just raise the question. you didn t raise the question. you said these chicago guys will do anything so they changed the number. you were asserting here in your tweet that you put out at 8:35 this morning, five minutes after the report came out,. did you talk to any economists or anybody in the accounting world that understood how the numbers were put together before you accused the chicago guys of changing the numbers. chris, i know these numbers gathered by a series of wild assumptions, maybe they weren t right at 8