people doesn t mean that my country and my people stopped needing it. it doesn t people stopped needing it. it doesn t mean that our homes are being doesn t mean that our homes are being bombarded. find doesn t mean that our homes are being bombarded. being bombarded. and if the is cominu being bombarded. and if the is coming from being bombarded. and if the is coming from this being bombarded. and if the is coming from this what - being bombarded. and if the is coming from this what will- being bombarded. and if the is l coming from this what will come being bombarded. and if the is - coming from this what will come from the skies is the reason that numbers of people are leaving the country or forced to be displaced within the country. that s10 million figure, almost a quarter of the population of ukraine, have basically left their homes because of this fighting. that must have huge implications for the country s stability, ability to feed itself, for the future. stabilit
support, historical moment and we need your support, your practical support. and we hope support, your practical support. and we hope that with your practical steps we hope that with your practical steps we we hope that with your practical steps we will show that you are part of ukrainian steps we will show that you are part of ukrainian history. please remember, this is practical modern history remember, this is practical modern history of remember, this is practical modern history of ukraine. we want to have peace history of ukraine. we want to have peace i history of ukraine. we want to have peace i am history of ukraine. we want to have peace. i am grateful for everyone of you in peace. i am grateful for everyone of you in the peace. i am grateful for everyone of you in the parliament of canada who was present there, to every canadian citizen was present there, to every canadian citizen i was present there, to every canadian citizen i am was present there,
that s producing secret judge-made law. there was a law, section 215, that was designed to protect american citizens from these invasive searches and seizures. the fisa court and the doj secretly reinterpreted that law to make it apply to the entire country. let me ask you this. if i can interrupt just for a moment here. one of the things the president did talk about is at least some sort of public advocate who would work on behalf of individuals who they might have these the phone numbers there would be some process. there would be a way of actually protecting those individuals. you don t see that that is significant in any way in trying to at least establish some sort of benefit, someone who would act on this person s behalf, a ci citizen s behalf. look, the fisa court itself was originally set up following recommendations from the church community in the 70s. and overtime, it was quickly