Meanwhile, these signs warning everyone about the papal parking restrictions went up last week. As you can see, though, plenty of people have yet to heed the warnings and if your vehicle is towed, the Parking Authority is assuring you they want you to get your car back. They will be able to call 215686 snow. Its the same number we use during snow emergencies when we relocate vehicles and that will tell them where their car is. Theres no fee he to get the car back. Reporter remember, these are just the initial phases of car removals. This has been which you can find on 6abc. Com breaks down the times and locations of each phase. If you live in the affected areas dealing with the security measures comes down to personal choice. Some folks are leaving their vehicles with friends or family who live outside the city. Others are competing for curbside parking spots in nonrestricted neighborhoods. Sean gutmann and fairmount says shes not sure what to do. Theres signs on some streets not other
A very good saturday morning to you. Right now, in this country, some 61 of workers, 18 and over, have access to some form of paid sick leave. About 49 million American Workers lack paid sick leave. Thats what we are talking about this morning. Only three states in this country require some form of paid sick leave. Here is a map this morning from the National Partnership for women and families. Those three states, california, massachusetts, and connecticut, connecticut and massachusetts laws provide 40 hours of sick time per calendar year. Calendars taxed at 241 hours. Law goes into effect in january. There is also over a dozen cities and municipalities around the country that have their own laws when it comes to paid sick leave but president obama has proposed a sevenpaid sick leave california year in his state of the union address. Here is the president on tuesday talking about that proposal. Today we are the only advanced country industry on earth that doesnt guarantee paid sick lea
You by telling the applicant theca appeal to you in 15 days then its asking to take this option and consider whether or not the permit applicant timely submitted his application. Its almost like a consent situation because its not truly a permit that was submitted. It feels like a jurisdictional issue to me. Should we proceed with the rest of the hearing . First of all i want to ask mr. Pacheco if we can get the closed captioning on in the room. I see that its not. Is there any other comment on this item . Seeing none, mr. Castillo, you have 3 minutes for rebuttal. This is your opportunity to address the body. The only thing i need to ask is if you can give me a chance to continue the application i can do it again, all the paperwork because what happened before they dont have the money for all the paperwork at the same time because its a lot of money to pay on my permit, its almost 5,000. Its my first time to get a permit in 2012. We get a lot of papers and paid for it and i paid for m
To complete the application by granting the appeal. In essence by doing that you are consenting to the issue before you. I think you have that option if you want to proceed that way. I tend to agree with commissioner hurtado, the action taken would be tolling the time at the department. I dont think thats really within our purview. The question is do we have jurisdiction. I guess there is two ways of looking at it. It is involving a permit although not fully completed but evidently its Strong Enough where they can release this one until someone makes a decision and thats why they are here today, right . But i agree with commissioner hurtado as well that maybe we are not the body that should hear that . Yeah, i mean, i think march 2012 was the initial application. Thats almost 2 years. I think that the department has been reasonable in their actions and has sent two Certified Mail notices one of which i think was received, one was returned and the other one was received and also an emai
Jurisdiction to do anything at this point. Its an administrative, the dpw has Administrative Discretion to deem it abandoned. Thats my position on it. What you are saying is we shouldnt have accepted this appeal . Right. I understand that point. I think it was confusing in trying to figure this out and im sure it was confusing for the legal side to look at this. But i would probably approach this slightly different in saying how can we allow some level of closure. I would probably allow him to complete his application because i think there is going to be appeals that the directors hearing and let them go through their process to determine whether its an appropriate location and then well see whatever comes back to us. Right, but what authority do we have to do that to do anything . I thought we had two options, one was to allow him to complete the application by granting the appeal. In essence by doing that you are consenting to the issue before you. I think you have that option if you