in new york city. they taught us, 15% is for bad service, 20% chump change, 25 and up for anything decent. i m used to this. new to the rest of the country. good deal, 25%. i think for the doordash deal. why you tip a machine is beyond me. cover that another day. this now from the hill. this merger is craven, blatant sports washing, and i am deeply disappointed and even outraged by the pga sellout. i think that the justice department ought to be continuing its investigation. in the meantime, there probably is a role for congress to play in some kind of oversight or scrutiny function. bill: a democratic senator after the surprise merger between the pga tour and the saudi arabia-own the liv golf,
compared to now when i have to do the marketing and liked by my book, or doorpost on instagram? is so embarrassing to do what i m doing right now but at least what i ve not done is a federal crime in an attempt to get more attention. at least i ve been shameless, i haven t been a felon, not too bright. if you could so 50000 more copies like you to do that for me, or do because of more people read the book it would be better for america. i am doing it for my country, that s what i m saying. gutfeld joke earlier this week. joey, take it away. these people risking their lives for chump change on the internet when kim kardashian taught us a long time ago you could cheaply make a consensual and put it out there and become a billionaire if it s all about attention and why not go the route that s proven?
his little reward for his slush fund, that s chump change. compared to how much they make off continuing to pollute for free, for instance, by stopping climate regulations. and also, they seem to be very clearly getting political goals ticked off. there has been a desire to overturn roe v. wade since the late 1970s, 73 when it passed, so shortly after that. they got that, check. they want deregulation, check. everything they want that the far right sort of christian minority wants, check check check check check. so it seems nee that if they re just another political body, why shouldn t they be regulated the way you all are regulated? or like the judges are regulated. we re not asking much. we re asking that they be regulated in their ethics behavior the exact way that the rest of the federal bench is already regulated. is the only way to fix this to expand the court? i think there are a lot of ways to fix this. one of them is to pass a law that requires them to put in
that look like change, chump change because it wasn t just that one undisclosed $500,000 vacation propublica uncover. they report for more than two decades two decades, clarence thomas har has accepted luxury trips virtually every year from mr. crow without disclosing them joining us now is jane mayer, the chief washington correspondent and the author of dark money the hidden history of the billionaires behind the rise of the radical right. jane, it s great to see you. there s no better person to talk to you about this. thanks for being here tonight. let me just first start with the reporting from propublica today. is this an open secret from people who report on the court, and are other justices doing things like this well, i mean the problem with this story is that because it shows that something was not disclosed, it s very hard to know what else is not being