will meet argentinian juan martin del potro in the semifinals on the women s side last the us honest assess if not to defending champion sloane stephens out of the tournament so a star actually retired in two thousand and thirteen because of injuries but she came back and will now compete in her first ever u.s. open semifinal. well canada heads into talks in washington today to renew nafta helen and doesn t look like canada is ready to back down it doesn t and in fact we heard from chum previously saying it to canada take it or leave it that was the ultimatum from trump prime minister trudeau reply that he was holding out for a win win deal rhetoric aside both parties have agreed to head back to the negotiating table today and with good reason the deal covers some trillion dollars worth of trade. prime minister trudeau didn t seem too concerned despite the importance of a trade agreement with the u.s. three quarters of canada s international commerce is with its southern neighbor but
sean: joining us now with more reaction, tonight s huge baking news, his book is incredible, the case against impeaching chum, alan dershowitz, fox news contributor andy mccarthy, mueller will accept some written answers from trump, professor alan dershowitz. it is an attempt to achieve a compromise. the answers will be vetted by the lawyers, and president trump is not going to be allowed to go off on a tangent and state his opinions on the state of the world, he is going to be answering, yes, no, i do not remember, and lawyer like answers, that seems like a perfectly reasonable resolution, but if they ask him in writing, what was your motive when he fired comey? he has every right to say, none of your business, executive privilege, article two. you have no right to probe my state of mind when i engage in a constitutionally protected act.
really doesn t like the press, comey, while he is throwing them life-sustaining chum to the seagulls.ta remember these greatest hits from the wikileaks podesta inbox? cnn s john harwood sent emails to hillary clinton. campaign chairman john podesta shamelessly sucking up to him offering campaign advice and praising the candidate. he was with her while he was covering the campaign. then there was juliette halpern at the washington post. she dropped podesta a line to give him a heads up she was going to publish and she included a little preview, how helpful. and the new york times s unbiased glenn thrush, he put is an appearance as well. he wrote to podesta a story ins progress to make sure i m not f ing anything up. like lanny davis, podesta was a
name if i botched. you believe him to be an important piece of this. why? once again, nicolle, we are seeing not oversight, but rather complete attempts to obstruct by calling as witnesses under subpoena to the hill people who some of whom are career public servants. jonathan moffa, for example, is a long-time career intelligence analyst in the counter intelligence division of the fbi. he s very smart. heeds been with this case since day one. so what they re doing is they have identified him by name. they are going to call him to the hill under subpoena. they are going to threaten contempt if he doesn t spill everything he knows as sensitive as it is about this case, and it s shameful that they re going to attack a public servant for political reasons. that s what we re going to watch happen here and i hope it doesn t happen. mike schmidt, how do they destroy the credibility of the fbi attacks land at the fbi? some of these people were, are highly regarded figures who had the bur
once again, nicolle, we are seeing not oversight, but rather complete attempts to obstruct by calling as witnesses under subpoena to the hill people who some of whom are career public servants. jonathan moffa, for example, is a long-time career intelligence analyst in the counterintelligence division of the fbi. he s very smart. he s been with this case since day one. so what they re doing is they have identified him by name. they are going to call him to the hill under subpoena. they are going to threaten contempt if he doesn t spill everything he knows as sensitive as it is about this case, and it s shameful that they re going to attack a public servant for political reasons. that s what we re going to watch happen here and i hope it doesn t happen. mike schmidt, how do they destroy the credibility of the fbi attacks land at the fbi? some of these people were, are highly regarded figures who had the bureau s interest in mind and they are now political chum in the water for rudy