so we d like to know, did secretary chu know about these two memos, did he endorse them, and was the original counsel for the department of energy replaced so that they could push this deal through. bill: there s going to be a lot of people watching this hearing when it gets underway on the 17th of november. is there a way for secretary chu to explain all this, do you believe? well, i think they re going to say the interpretation of that one sentence in the energy policy act is open to interpretation. in fact, their interpretation, i think, is totally erroneous. but i think the american people had it right to hear his side, as well as the department of energy s counsel, who we intend to bring up, before we bring secretary chu up, so that we hear their point of view under oath and then hear secretary chu under oath describe why he agrees or disagrees. bill: and you pointed this out, too. this report suggests that the investors in the company, the deal was reworked so that the investor