i have a cold with this annoying runny nose. [ sniffles ] i better take something. [ male announcer ] dayquil cold and flu doesn t treat all that. it doesn t? [ male announcer ] alka-seltzer plus fights your worst cold symptoms plus has a fast-acting antihistamine. oh, what a relief it is! plus has a fast-acting antihistamine. at any minute. .you could be a victim of fraud. most people don t even know it. fraud could mean lower credit scores. .and higher interest rates when you apply for a credit card. it s a problem waiting to happen. check your credit score, check your credit report, at experian.com. america s number one provider of online credit reports and scores. don t take chances. go to experian.com.
about our motion for dna testing. he just ruled on that without a hearing. i pointed out that we ve now been fighting for three years to get this testing, and that mr. bradley had fought us every step of the way. at the time i thought three years was a long time. but i told the court and i m quoting your honor, there is a blood-stained bandanna that was found at the crime scene. it was found, taken into custody by the sheriff. it contained a hair. this bandanna may contain the blood of the victim, christine morton, plus perhaps mingled with the blood of the murderer. but it may also contain skin cells, saliva, sweat, there s also this hair that may contain the dna of the murderer. they ve never been subjected to dna testing. i was very honest with the judges we were in front of. i would say, look, judge, we don t know if this bandanna is connected to the crime. it certainly seems like a real possibility given that it s a
and we sought dna testing on the swabs from christine s body. we asked for the bloody bandanna found 100 yards behind the house along what we always believed to be the escape route of the murderer to be dna tested. john bradley was the district attorney of williamson county at the time we filed the motion for dna testing. so i called up mr. bradley and i introduced myself. and i tried to explain to him the logic of what we were doing, that we were only seeking the truth. and he said it would muddy the waters, that testing the dna would muddy the waters. and i didn t understand what he meant. i said, mr. bradley, truth clarifies. why oppose it? it makes no sense. but he continued to oppose it. he asked for several extensions in even responding to our motions. so months passed and more months
Transcripts for CNN Unreal Dream The Michael Mor 20131215 05:21:15 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
he was casing the house before the murder. that was in their file. in 1987. they knew. once we got the dna results and we knew a, it was christine morton s blood and b, that it wasn t michael s blood or skin cells i should say on the ban dana, none of his dna, that was terrific. the dna of this other person was intermingled with christine s dna. it really places the bandanna at the murder scene. so the next step was to work with the texas state crime lab to get it entered into the database to see if it matched any convicted offenders or unsolved crimes. fortunately, there is now a vast database of dna profiles from convicted offenders and unsolved crimes plus codus, a national