The if we got rid of the lower middle class homes and replace them with highrise is and restaurants and office space for the private company pfizer. So they took him away using their Eminent Domain power under the constitution and of course when the homeowners object to, basically you can take away Property Rights, that is what the constitution says because you can use the imminent domain power for public use. Like a highway, like a military base, post office expanding the road. There are lots of public uses we can think of, but one thing we know public use doesnt mean private use in taking away private property and giving it away to a private Company Seems like a private use. So they took it to the Supreme Court and shockingly they said it was perfectly fine to take away private homes and give it away to a private company because the public purpose of increasing tax revenue and creating jobs and it is just a horrible decision because essentially what that means is all of our homes are
So-called "right-to-try" is a cruel sham that holds out the mostly false hope of survival to terminally ill patients and their families. In return, all they have to give up is patient protections and agree to pay to be guinea pigs to test a drug company's product. The product of an ideology that uses the terminally ill as shields to hide the ideological motives behind the law, which are to hobble the FDA, right-to-try is a terrible idea. It's bad for patients, but it just passed the Senate and could well become the law of the land when the House reconvenes in September if it isn't stopped.
Excelling at Your First Internship ricochet.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from ricochet.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.